Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Controversies in Diagnosis, Biology, and Treatment

作者: Michael D. Lagios

DOI: 10.1111/J.1524-4741.1995.TB00222.X

关键词: Surgical excisionDuctal carcinomaLow-Grade DCISNuclear gradeDiseasePathologyMammographic microcalcificationMedicine

摘要: : A clinically relevant classification and understanding of the biology ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is mandated by increasing numbers mammographically detected lesions limited size being considered for breast-conserving therapy. DCIS a morphologically biologically diverse assemblage that are conventionally classified an arbitrary largely descriptive manner based on architectural features. Several classifications nuclear grade necrosis have been shown to stratify into subtypes associated with vastly different risks local recurrence invasive transformation. Breast-conserving therapy dependent adequate surgical excision, even more so than breast carcinomas, but procedure itself made difficult ability define pathologic extent lesion basis mammographic microcalcification, vagaries localization procedure, multifocal nature some subtypes. Proper tissue processing interpretation, particularly regard presence or misinterpretation microinvasion, all affect success therapy. Irradiation would appear no role treatment low adequately excised. The benefits irradiation be high benefit diminishes follow-up. Irradiation not likely control patients significant residual disease who undergo

参考文章(41)
V Eusebi, B Zafrani, J L Peterse, R Holland, D Faverly, R R Millis, M J van de Vijver, Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology. ,vol. 11, pp. 167- 180 ,(1994)
Michael D. Lagios, Duct Carcinoma in Situ: Pathology and Treatment Surgical Clinics of North America. ,vol. 70, pp. 853- 871 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0039-6109(16)45185-6
Rosemary R. Millis, John G. Azzopardi, Ali Ahmed, Problems in breast pathology ,(1979)
John S. Meyer, Cell kinetics of histologic variants ofin situ breast carcinoma Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. ,vol. 7, pp. 171- 180 ,(1986) , 10.1007/BF01806247
C.O.C. Bellamy, C. McDonald, D.M. Salter, U. Chetty, T.J. Anderson, Noninvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: The relevance of histologic categorization Human Pathology. ,vol. 24, pp. 16- 23 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90057-N
Robert L. Egan, John T. Ellis, R. Waldo Powell, Team approach to the study of diseases of the breast Cancer. ,vol. 23, pp. 847- 854 ,(1969) , 10.1002/1097-0142(196904)23:4<847::AID-CNCR2820230419>3.0.CO;2-E
Melvin J. Silverstein, James R. Waisman, Parvis Gamagami, Eugene D. Gierson, William J. Colburn, Robert J. Rosser, Patricia S. Gordon, Bernard S. Lewinsky, Aaron Fingerhut, Intraductal carcinoma of the breast (208 cases): Clinical factors influencing treatment choice Cancer. ,vol. 66, pp. 102- 108 ,(1990) , 10.1002/1097-0142(19900701)66:1<102::AID-CNCR2820660119>3.0.CO;2-5
Robert Muir, The evolution of carcinoma of the mamma The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology. ,vol. 52, pp. 155- 172 ,(1941) , 10.1002/PATH.1700520202
Gyda Lolk Ottesen, Hans Peder Graversen, Mogens Blichert-Toft, Karin Zedeler, Johan A. Andersen, Lobular Carcinoma In Situ of the Female Breast: Short-Term Results of a Prospective Nationwide Study The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. ,vol. 17, pp. 14- 21 ,(1992) , 10.1097/00000478-199212000-00005