Causes of failure in periprosthetic fractures of the hip at 1- to 14-year follow-up.

作者: Mauro Spina , Guido Rocca , Alessandro Canella , Andrea Scalvi

DOI: 10.1016/J.INJURY.2014.10.029

关键词: Mortality rateHarris Hip ScoreRadiological weaponSurgeryProsthesisVancouver classificationOsteosynthesisMedicineFracture fixationPeriprosthetic

摘要: Abstract Introduction The results and causes of failure for 61 patients undergoing surgery femoral hip periprosthetic fracture are reported. Materials methods Fractures were classified according to the Vancouver System. Osteosynthesis was performed in 88% cases prosthetic revision 12% cases. Clinical functional outcomes assessed Harris Hip Score radiological evaluated using Beals Tower's criteria. Results At a mean follow-up 32 months, 73.1 excellent-to-good 72.2% after first surgery. end treatment, complete healing stability prosthesis found 87.3% patients. most relevant result recovery walking 73.8% Mortality 1.6% at 3 months 3.3% 12 months. A higher mortality rate occurred when delayed more than 5 days trauma. Conclusions analysis our shows that type B1 fractures treated with plating osteosynthesis, there worse total arthroplasty cemented stems compared uncemented stems. In B2 cementless straight stems, osteosynthesis plate can be valid option. C fractures, stem must carefully assessed.

参考文章(31)
Greg E. Gaski, Sean P. Scully, In Brief: Classifications in Brief: Vancouver Classification of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. ,vol. 469, pp. 1507- 1510 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S11999-010-1532-0
Aaron L. McLean, James T. Patton, Matthew Moran, Femoral replacement for salvage of periprosthetic fracture around a total hip replacement. Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured. ,vol. 43, pp. 1166- 1169 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.INJURY.2012.03.024
Iain W.W. McGraw, Stephanie C. Spence, Emily J. Baird, Sarah M. Eckhardt, Gamada E. Ayana, Incidence of periprosthetic fractures after hip hemiarthroplasty: Are uncemented prostheses unsafe? Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured. ,vol. 44, pp. 1945- 1948 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.INJURY.2013.07.023
Hans Lindahl, Göran Garellick, Hans Regnér, Peter Herberts, Henrik Malchau, Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 88, pp. 1215- 1222 ,(2006) , 10.2106/JBJS.E.00457
H. Lindahl, H. Malchau, A. Odén, G. Garellick, Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume. ,vol. 88, pp. 26- 30 ,(2006) , 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.17029
Peter V. Giannoudis, Nikolaos K. Kanakaris, Eleftherios Tsiridis, Principles of internal fixation and selection of implants for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured. ,vol. 38, pp. 669- 687 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.INJURY.2007.02.050
Bernd Fink, Alexandra Grossmann, Joachim Singer, Hip revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of vancouver type B2 and B3. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. ,vol. 26, pp. 206- 211 ,(2012) , 10.1097/BOT.0B013E318220A94F
Rong-Xin He, Li-Dong Wu, Xue-Song Dai, Xiang-Hua Wang, Hao-Bo Wu, Shi-Gui Yan, Combined use of extensively porous coated femoral components with onlay cortical strut allografts in revision of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Chinese Medical Journal. ,vol. 122, pp. 2612- 2615 ,(2009)
B A Masri, C P Duncan, D S Garbuz, Periprosthetic fractures of the femur: principles of prevention and management. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 47, pp. 237- 242 ,(1998)