A METHOD FOR COMPARING CONCEPTS WITH RESPECT TO SUSTAINABILITY AND OTHER VALUES

作者: Rachael Gould , Anthony Thompson

DOI:

关键词: Sustainability organizationsProduct (category theory)Sustainable product developmentSustainabilityKnowledge managementContext (language use)Value (ethics)Social sustainabilityProcess (engineering)Engineering

摘要: The audience for this research is fellow researchers and others helping product developers to start including sustainability when they are selecting concepts.The aims of the were understand needs integrating into concept selection what might be done help them.The approach was iterate between three studies design methodology. first study focused on understanding challenges that face selection. aim second identify potential support deal with challenges. And third try out see if it actually helps address face. These executed through reviewing literature exploring two cases.The results led a focus supporting decision-making process analysing respect social sustainability. Selecting concepts complex decision made under challenging conditions. Bringing in complex, new unfamiliar aspects can make good even more challenging. When sustainability, particular barriers errors due illusory correlation confirmation bias.Despite challenges, how you at making decisions matters. drives decisions. This especially relevant bringing aspects, such as A likely candidate achieve active, value-focused decision-support. In other words, structuring bite-sized steps using techniques avoid bias. At each step, decision-makers’ anchored by things stakeholders value important. Further required investigate details employ these process-support approaches context decision-making.In addition process, complicated demand analysis. Support identified gap. We explored contribute analysis, but found not useful hand. opened up some interesting questions further research.

参考文章(22)
Joe Peppard, Anna Rylander, From value chain to value network: Insights for mobile operators European Management Journal. ,vol. 24, pp. 128- 141 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.EMJ.2006.03.003
Yuanling Tan, Xuening Chu, Zaifang Zhang, Xiuli Geng, Customer Value Optimization in Product Service System Design Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 93- 98 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-3-642-19689-8_18
Amaresh Chakrabarti, Lucienne T. M. Blessing, DRM, a Design Research Methodology ,(2009)
L. Failing, R. Gregory, D. Ohlson, T. McDaniels, G. Long, M. Harstone, Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices ,(2012)
Merlina Missimer, The Social Dimension of Strategic Sustainable Development Blekinge Institute of Technology. ,(2013)
Jean Hartley, Case study research Sage Publications Ltd. ,(2004)
Henrik Ny, Jamie P. MacDonald, Göran Broman, Ryoichi Yamamoto, Karl-Henrik Robért, Sustainability Constraints as System Boundaries: An Approach to Making Life‐Cycle Management Strategic Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 10, pp. 61- 77 ,(2008) , 10.1162/108819806775545349
Laura Sokka, Matti Melanen, Ari Nissinen, How can the sustainability of industrial symbioses be measured Progress in Industrial Ecology, An International Journal. ,vol. 5, pp. 518- ,(2008) , 10.1504/PIE.2008.023414
James R. Bettman, John W. Payne, Eric J. Johnson, The adaptive decision maker ,(1993)