Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.

作者: Randy P. Fiorentino , Marc A. Zepeda , Bram H. Goldstein , Cameron R. John , Mark A. Rettenmaier

DOI: 10.1016/J.JMIG.2005.11.001

关键词: Robotic surgeryPatient statusSurgeryMedicineLaparoscopyLaparoscopic hysterectomyTask forceHysterectomyComplicationGeneral surgeryLaparotomy

摘要: Abstract Study objective To examine the operative variables and complications associated with robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Design Canadian Task Force classification II-1. Setting Gynecology service affiliated a major cancer center in Southern California. Patients Twenty women benign gynecologic condition. Intervention Robotic-assisted Patient status was evaluated terms of morbidity, length surgery, anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay. Measurements main results Mean time 3.2 hours, 4 hours. loss 81 mL, patient postoperative stay 2 days. The complication rate this study low. surgical procedure converted to laparotomy abdominal hysterectomy two patients because poor visualization during surgery. Conclusions While number nonrandomized nature single-institution experience are insufficient draw any definitive conclusions regarding potential treatment efficacy, low rates suggest that is feasible promising. Additional comparing efficacy cost robotic standard larger population warranted.

参考文章(12)
Sherry Weitzen, Jeffrey F. Peipert, Roxanne M. Jamshidi, Andrea J. Diluigi, Prophylactic antibiotic administration prior to hysterectomy: a quality improvement initiative. Journal of Reproductive Medicine. ,vol. 49, pp. 949- 954 ,(2004)
C. Diaz-Arrastia, C. Jurnalov, G. Gomez, C. Townsend, Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 16, pp. 1271- 1273 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00464-002-8523-5
Michel Degueldre, Jean Vandromme, Phan Thi Huong, Guy Bernard Cadière, Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 74, pp. 1020- 1023 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01543-0
Chung-Chang Shen, Ming-Ping Wu, Fu-Tsai Kung, Fu-Jen Huang, Chin-Hsiung Hsieh, Kuo-Chung Lan, Eng-Yen Huang, Te-Yao Hsu, Shiuh-Young Chang, Major complications associated with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: Ten-year experience Journal of The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. ,vol. 10, pp. 147- 153 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60289-7
William H. Parker, Total laparoscopic hysterectomy Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. ,vol. 27, pp. 431- 440 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0889-8545(00)80033-9
David S Di Marco, George K Chow, Matthew T Gettman, Daniel S Elliott, Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology. ,vol. 63, pp. 373- 376 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2003.09.033
Tommaso Falcone, Jeffrey M Goldberg, Harout Margossian, Laurel Stevens, Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study☆ Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 73, pp. 1040- 1042 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00423-4
HARRY REICH, FRAN McGLYNN, ROBERT BUDIN, GEORGE TSOUTSOPLIDES, JOHN DeCAPRIO, Laparoscopic Treatment of Ruptured Interstitial Pregnancy Journal of Gynecologic Surgery. ,vol. 6, pp. 135- 138 ,(1990) , 10.1089/GYN.1990.6.135
Katherine A O'Hanlan, Lisbeth Lopez, Suzanne L Dibble, Anne-Caroline Garnier, Gloria Shining Huang, Mirjam Leuchtenberger, Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: body mass index and outcomes Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 102, pp. 1384- 1392 ,(2003) , 10.1016/J.OBSTETGYNECOL.2003.08.018