作者: Fiona Haines
关键词:
摘要: The risks at the heart of regulation are most often understood as unwanted by-products an essentially productive endeavor. They to be captured and managed through dedicated technical bureaucratic effort, preserve those skilled in assessment probability impact accomplished design effective—and efficient—regulatory strategies. Yet such a view seriously misunderstands complexity risk that must address. When is viewed from social organizational vantage point, more political character emerge. This article teases apart three fundamental ideal types inherent regulatory processes, only one which (labeled actuarial risk) apprehensible scientific or frame reference. Of equal importance sociocultural risks, cannot relegated lesser priority by understanding labels their on variously unwarranted, irrational, e...