"Opening up" and "closing down" power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology

作者: Andy Stirling

DOI: 10.1177/0162243907311265

关键词:

摘要: Discursive deference in the governance of science and technology is rebalancing from expert analysis toward participatory deliberation. Linear, scientistic conceptions innovation are giving ground to more plural, socially situated understandings. Yet, growing recognition social agency choice countered by persistently deterministic notions technological progress. This article addresses this increasingly stark disjuncture. Distinguishing between appraisal commitment choice, it highlights contrasting implications normative, instrumental, substantive imperatives appraisal. Focusing on role power, identifies key commonalities transcending analysis/participation dichotomy. Each equally susceptible instrumental framing for variously weak strong forms justification. To address disjuncture, concluded that greater appreciation requiredin both analytic appraisalto facilitating opening up (rather than closing down) commitments technology.

参考文章(110)
Jürgen Habermas, Jeremy J. Shapiro, Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics Science & Society. ,vol. 35, ,(1971)
Broers, The Triumph of Technology TAEBC-2009. ,(2005)
John † Rawls, The Idea of Public Reason Revisited University of Chicago Law Review. ,vol. 64, pp. 37- 80 ,(1997) , 10.4324/9781315095455-5
Thomas J. Misa, Philip Brey, Andrew Feenberg, Modernity and Technology MIT Press. ,(2002)
Phil Macnaghten, Brian Wynne, Robin Grove-White, Wising up : the public and new technologies Lancaster University: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change. ,(2000)
Patrick Van Zwanenberg, Erik Millstone, BSE: Risk, Science, and Governance ,(2005)
Robert J. Toft, Accountability in Action. ,(1975)