Extraction of macroscopic and microscopic adjoint concepts using a lattice Boltzmann method and discrete adjoint approach.

作者: Mohamad Hamed Hekmat , Masoud Mirzaei

DOI: 10.1103/PHYSREVE.91.013303

关键词:

摘要: In the present research, we tried to improve performance of lattice Boltzmann (LB) -based adjoint approach by utilizing mesoscopic inherent LB method. this regard, two macroscopic discrete (MADA) and microscopic (MIDA) approaches are used answer following challenging questions. Is it possible extend concept variables flow field corresponding ones? Further, similar conservative laws in method, is find comparable conservation equations approach? If so, then a definite framework, that solution can be employed sensitivity analysis MIDA approach. This achievement decrease implementation cost coding efforts method complicated problems. First, MADA extracted based on using duality viewpoint. Meanwhile, an elementary case, inverse design two-dimensional unsteady Poiseuille periodic channel with constant body forces, procedure analytical evaluation described. The numerical results show correlations between distribution functions seen ones. Besides, promising, emphasizing evaluated via functions. Finally, introduced.

参考文章(42)
Mohamad Hamed Hekmat, Masoud Mirzaei, Ehsan Izadpanah, Constrained and non-constrained aerodynamic optimization using the adjoint equations approach Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. ,vol. 23, pp. 2479- 2491 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S12206-009-0707-7
Osamu Tonomura, Manabu Kano, Shinji Hasebe, Shape Optimization of Microchannels Using CFD and Adjoint Method Computer-aided chemical engineering. ,vol. 28, pp. 37- 42 ,(2010) , 10.1016/S1570-7946(10)28007-0
Jacques E.V. Peter, Richard P. Dwight, Numerical sensitivity analysis for aerodynamic optimization: A survey of approaches Computers & Fluids. ,vol. 39, pp. 373- 391 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.COMPFLUID.2009.09.013
Jason E. Hicken, David W. Zingg, Aerodynamic Optimization Algorithm with Integrated Geometry Parameterization and Mesh Movement AIAA Journal. ,vol. 48, pp. 400- 413 ,(2010) , 10.2514/1.44033
Ronald D. Joslin, Max D. Gunzburger, Roy A. Nicolaides, Gordon Erlebacher, M. Yousuff Hussaini, A Self-Contained, Automated Methodology for Optimal Flow Control AIAA Journal. ,vol. 35, pp. 816- 824 ,(1997) , 10.2514/2.7452
Antoine McNamara, Adrien Treuille, Zoran Popović, Jos Stam, Fluid control using the adjoint method ACM Transactions on Graphics. ,vol. 23, pp. 449- 456 ,(2004) , 10.1145/1015706.1015744
Jonathan B. Freund, Adjoint-based optimization for understanding and suppressing jet noise Journal of Sound and Vibration. ,vol. 330, pp. 4114- 4122 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JSV.2011.02.009
Brett F. Sanders, Nikolaos D. Katopodes, Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis for Shallow-Water Wave Control Journal of Engineering Mechanics-asce. ,vol. 126, pp. 909- 919 ,(2000) , 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:9(909)
Leon M. Arriola, James M. Hyman, Being Sensitive to Uncertainty Computing in Science and Engineering. ,vol. 9, pp. 10- 20 ,(2007) , 10.1109/MCSE.2007.27
F. Fang, C. C. Pain, M. D. Piggott, G. J. Gorman, A. J. H. Goddard, An adaptive mesh adjoint data assimilation method applied to free surface flows International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. ,vol. 47, pp. 995- 1001 ,(2005) , 10.1002/FLD.865