Approaches to Comparative Analysis in Archaeology
作者： Michael E. Smith , Peter Peregrine
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139022712.004
关键词:
摘要: Archaeology is inherently comparative. Comparison necessary to understand the material record, for one cannot identify or an object never before seen without comparing it a known object. also variation over time and space, investigate unless has examples spanning range of variation, nor can examine change time. Comparative analysis only way regularities in human behavior, unique features societies. Indeed, Bruce G. Trigger comparative nature archaeological data places archaeology at heart most important issues social sciences:
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(44)
Peter N. Peregrine, Atlas of Cultural Evolution ,(2003)
George P. Murdock, Douglas R. White, Standard Cross-Cultural Sample Ethnology. ,vol. 8, pp. 329- ,(1969) , 10.2307/3772907
Cedric Pugh, Squatter settlements Cities. ,vol. 17, pp. 325- 337 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0264-2751(00)00029-9
Adam T Smith, The Political Landscape: Constellations of Authority in Early Complex Polities University of California Press. ,(2003) , 10.1525/9780520936997
Michael E. Smith, Braudel's temporal rhythms and chronology theory in archaeology Archaeology, Annales, and Ethnohistory. pp. 23- 34 ,(1992) , 10.1017/CBO9780511759949.003
Andre Gingrich, Richard G. Fox, Anthropology, by Comparison ,(2002)
Robert C. Hunt, Beyond Relativism: Comparability in Cultural Anthropology ,(2007)
Morton H. Fried, The Evolution of Political Society: An Essay in Political Anthropology ,(1967)
Gustaf Oscar Augustin Montelius, F. H. Woods, The civilisation of Sweden in heathen times ,(1888)
Leslie A White, The Evolution of Culture; The Development of Civilization to the Fall of Rome. ,(1959)