Environmental implications of gene flow from sugar beet to wild beet--current status and future research needs.

作者: Detlef Bartsch , Joel Cuguen , Enrico Biancardi , Jeremy Sweet

DOI: 10.1051/EBR:2003006

关键词:

摘要: Gene flow via seed or pollen is a basic biological process in plant evolution. The ecological and genetic consequences of gene depend on the amount direction as well fitness hybrids. assessment potential risks transgenic plants should take into account fact that conventional crops can often cross with wild plants. precautionary approach risk management genetically modified (GMPs) may make it necessary to monitor significant weed populations might be affected by transgene escape. hard control wind-pollinated like beet (Beta vulgaris). In addition, potentially undergo evolutionary changes which expand their geographical distribution. Unintended products cultivated beets pollinated are bolt flower during first year planting. Weed cause yield losses delay harvest. Wild important resources preservation diversity Europe has been considered biosafety research. We present here methodology research approaches used for monitoring distribution Beta populations. It recently shown century from vulgaris ssp. not altered L. maritima (L.) Arcang. Italian sugar production area. Future focus evolution comparison these baseline data. Two models presented describing how endpoints measured: (1) “Pre-post” crop commercialization against today’s (2) “Parallel” GMP free reference areas/ Model 2 advantage taking ongoing population dynamics account. 1 more applicable if so strong most areas/populations contain GMPs. Important traits change ecology genes confer tolerance biotic abiotic stress. An environmental effects realistically only based introgression, include economic values biodiversity littoral other ecosystems containing beet. general, there still great need harmonize worldwide systems development appropriate methods evaluate impact introgressed transgenes.

参考文章(42)
Xavier Reboud, Jacques Gasquez, Henri Darmency, A multisite-cooperative research programme on risk assessment of transgenic crops Birkhäuser, Basel. pp. 17- 20 ,(1999) , 10.1007/978-3-0348-8700-7_2
L. Frese, B. Desprez, D. Ziegler, Potential of genetic resources and breeding strategies for base-broadening in Beta. Broadening the genetic base of crop production. pp. 295- 309 ,(2000) , 10.1079/9780851994116.0295
M. J. Crawley, S. L. Brown, R. S. Hails, D. D. Kohn, M. Rees, Transgenic crops in natural habitats Nature. ,vol. 409, pp. 682- 683 ,(2001) , 10.1038/35055621
Jarle Tufto, Kjetil Hindar, Steinar Engen, Alan F. Raybould, Analysis of genetic structure and dispersal patterns in a population of sea beet. Genetics. ,vol. 149, pp. 1975- 1985 ,(1998) , 10.1093/GENETICS/149.4.1975
David K. Worthylake, Kent L. Rossman, John Sondek, Crystal structure of Rac1 in complex with the guanine nucleotide exchange region of Tiam1. Nature. ,vol. 408, pp. 682- 688 ,(2000) , 10.1038/35047014
J.P.W. Letschert, Beta section Beta : biogeographical patterns of variation, and taxonomy Wageningen Agricultural University. ,(1993)
Sarah Driessen, Matthias Pohl, Detlef Bartsch, RAPD-PCR analysis of the genetic origin of sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) at Germany's Baltic Sea coast Basic and Applied Ecology. ,vol. 2, pp. 341- 349 ,(2001) , 10.1078/1439-1791-00061
Detlef Bartsch, Ulrike Brand, Claudia Morak, Matthias Pohl-Orf, Ingolf Schuphan, Norman C. Ellstrand, BIOSAFETY OF HYBRIDS BETWEEN TRANSGENIC VIRUS-RESISTANT SUGAR BEET AND SWISS CHARD Ecological Applications. ,vol. 11, pp. 142- 147 ,(2001) , 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0142:BOHBTV]2.0.CO;2