Object-Based Verification of Precipitation Forecasts. Part II: Application to Convective Rain Systems

作者: Christopher Davis , Barbara Brown , Randy Bullock

DOI: 10.1175/MWR3146.1

关键词:

摘要: The authors develop and apply an algorithm to define coherent areas of precipitation, emphasizing mesoscale convection, and compare properties of these areas with observations obtained from NCEP stage-IV precipitation analyses (gauge and radar combined). In Part II, fully explicit 12–36-h forecasts of rainfall from the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) are evaluated. These forecasts are integrated on a 4-km mesh without a cumulus parameterization. Rain areas are defined similarly to Part I, but emphasize more intense, smaller areas. Furthermore, a time-matching algorithm is devised to group spatially and temporally coherent areas into rain systems that approximate mesoscale convective systems. In general, the WRF model produces too many rain areas with length scales of 80 km or greater. Rain systems typically last too long, and are forecast to occur 1–2 h later than observed. The intensity distribution among rain systems in the 4-km forecasts is generally too broad, especially in the late afternoon, in sharp contrast to the intensity distribution obtained on a coarser grid with parameterized convection in Part I. The model exhibits the largest positive size and intensity bias associated with systems over the Midwest and Mississippi Valley regions, but little size bias over the High Plains, Ohio Valley, and the southeast United States. For rain systems lasting 6 h or more, the critical success index for matching forecast and observed rain systems agrees closely with that obtained in a related study using manually determined rain systems.

参考文章(11)
Harold E. Brooks, Charles A. Doswell, A Comparison of Measures-Oriented and Distributions-Oriented Approaches to Forecast Verification Weather and Forecasting. ,vol. 11, pp. 288- 303 ,(1996) , 10.1175/1520-0434(1996)011<0288:ACOMOA>2.0.CO;2
James Done, Christopher A. Davis, Morris Weisman, The next generation of NWP: explicit forecasts of convection using the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model Atmospheric Science Letters. ,vol. 5, pp. 110- 117 ,(2004) , 10.1002/ASL.72
Aiguo Dai, Filippo Giorgi, Kevin E. Trenberth, Observed and model‐simulated diurnal cycles of precipitation over the contiguous United States Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 104, pp. 6377- 6402 ,(1999) , 10.1029/98JD02720
Christopher Davis, Barbara Brown, Randy Bullock, Object-Based Verification of Precipitation Forecasts. Part I: Methodology and Application to Mesoscale Rain Areas Monthly Weather Review. ,vol. 134, pp. 1772- 1784 ,(2006) , 10.1175/MWR3145.1
J. MICHALAKES, S. CHEN, J. DUDHIA, L. HART, J. KLEMP, J. MIDDLECOFF, W. SKAMAROCK, Development of a Next-Generation Regional Weather Research and Forecast Model ieee international conference on high performance computing data and analytics. pp. 269- 276 ,(2001) , 10.1142/9789812799685_0024
William (Matt) Briggs, Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 102, pp. 380- 380 ,(2007) , 10.1198/JASA.2007.S163
E.E Ebert, J.L McBride, Verification of precipitation in weather systems: determination of systematic errors Journal of Hydrology. ,vol. 239, pp. 179- 202 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00343-7
RE Carbone, JD Tuttle, DA Ahijevych, SB Trier, None, Inferences of Predictability Associated with Warm Season Precipitation Episodes Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. ,vol. 59, pp. 2033- 2056 ,(2002) , 10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<2033:IOPAWW>2.0.CO;2