The Future of Technology Assessment
作者： Michael Rodemeyer , Daniel Sarewitz , James Wilsdon
DOI:
关键词:
摘要:
参考文章(13)
Joy Bill, Why The Future Doesn't Need Us ,(2003)
John R Durant, Geoffrey A Evans, Geoffrey P Thomas, None, The public understanding of science Nature. ,vol. 340, pp. 11- 14 ,(1989) , 10.1038/340011A0
Madison Public Schools (Wis.). Department of Curriculum Development, Science and Society ,(1969)
David H. Guston, Daniel Sarewitz, Real-time technology assessment Technology in Society. ,vol. 24, pp. 93- 109 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1
Roland Jackson, Fiona Barbagallo, Helen Haste, Strengths of Public Dialogue on Science‐related Issues Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. ,vol. 8, pp. 349- 358 ,(2005) , 10.1080/13698230500187227
David H. Guston, Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction Science, Technology, & Human Values. ,vol. 26, pp. 399- 408 ,(2001) , 10.1177/016224390102600401
Johan Schot, Arie Rip, The past and future of constructive technology assessment Technological Forecasting and Social Change. ,vol. 54, pp. 251- 268 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
M. G. Morgan, SCIENCE AND GOVERNMENT: Improving Science and Technology Advice for Congress Science. ,vol. 293, pp. 1999- 2000 ,(2001) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1065128
Daniel Sarewitz, How science makes environmental controversies worse Environmental Science & Policy. ,vol. 7, pp. 385- 403 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2004.06.001
Jon M. Peha, Thinking about Alternative Models Routledge. pp. 113- 117 ,(2003) , 10.4324/9781936331208-14