The science and art of quality in obstetric ultrasound

作者: Laurent J Salomon , Yves Ville

DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0B013E3283294862

关键词:

摘要: Purpose of review Due to the imbalance between increasing demand, limitations in healthcare resources and an increase lawsuit cases prenatal ultrasound practice, need for quality has emerged field ultrasound. Recent findings Over past few years, various approaches control based on nuchal translucency measurements, other biometric measurements or fetal images have been developed tested. Summary This describes qualitative quantitative procedures. Special emphasis is put use biometry develop systems both approaches.

参考文章(35)
R. J. M. Snijders, E. A. Thom, J. M. Zachary, L. D. Platt, N. Greene, L. G. Jackson, R. E. Sabbagha, K. Filkins, R. K. Silver, W. A. Hogge, N. A. Ginsberg, S. Beverly, P. Morgan, K. Blum, P. Chilis, L. M. Hill, J. Hecker, R. J. Wapner, First-trimester trisomy screening: nuchal translucency measurement training and quality assurance to correct and unify technique. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 19, pp. 353- 359 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1469-0705.2002.00637.X
D. J. Biau, R. Porcher, L. J. Salomon, CUSUM: a tool for ongoing assessment of performance Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 31, pp. 252- 255 ,(2008) , 10.1002/UOG.5270
Steven R. Goldstein, Accreditation, Certification: Why All the Confusion? Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 110, pp. 1396- 1398 ,(2007) , 10.1097/01.AOG.0000289225.54215.E9
S. Campbell, Alison Thoms, Ultrasound measurement of the fetal head to abdomen circumference ratio in the assessment of growth retardation British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 84, pp. 165- 174 ,(1977) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1977.TB12550.X
Arie Herman, Ron Maymon, Eli Dreazen, Efraim Zohav, Octav Segal, Shmuel Segal, Zwi Weinraub, Utilization of the Nuchal Translucency Image-Scoring Method during Training of New Examiners Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. ,vol. 14, pp. 234- 239 ,(1999) , 10.1159/000020928
Tracy Roberts, Jane Henderson, Miranda Mugford, Leanne Bricker, James Neilson, Jo Garcia, Antenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: a systematic review of studies of cost and cost effectiveness. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 109, pp. 44- 56 ,(2002) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2002.00223.X
E. Tegnander, W. Williams, O. J. Johansen, H.-G. K. Blaas, S. H. Eik-Nes, Prenatal detection of heart defects in a non-selected population of 30,149 fetuses--detection rates and outcome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 27, pp. 252- 265 ,(2006) , 10.1002/UOG.2710
K. Ritchie, I. Bradbury, J. Slattery, D. Wright, K. Iqbal, G. Penney, Economic modelling of antenatal screening and ultrasound scanning programmes for identification of fetal abnormalities. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 112, pp. 866- 874 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2005.00560.X
L. J. Salomon, J. P. Bernard, M. Duyme, I. Buvat, Y. Ville, The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 25, pp. 559- 565 ,(2005) , 10.1002/UOG.1901
L. J. Salomon, N. Winer, J. P. Bernard, Y. Ville, A score-based method for quality control of fetal images at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination. Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 28, pp. 822- 827 ,(2008) , 10.1002/PD.2016