An academia beyond quantity: a reply to Loyola et al. and Halme et al.

摘要: We recently criticised academia's obsession with quantity in papers, citations, and grant income. An overly strong focus on such metrics has produced ever busier academics, shorter less comprehensive time for nuanced discussion, local, empirical research – and, ultimately, eroded creativity reflection [1]. Loyola et al. [2] Halme [3] challenged some of our assertions contributed useful thoughts to advance this discussion. argued that the very we had fact helped foster better quality new networks Brazil.