Integrated Assessment and Consultation for the Preoperative Patient

作者: David G. Silverman , Stanley H. Rosenbaum

DOI: 10.1016/J.ANCLIN.2009.09.001

关键词:

摘要: Assessment of the presurgical patient requires interdisciplinary cooperation over continuum documentation and optimization existing disorders, determination resilience reserve, planning for subsequent interventions care. For many patients, evident or suspected morbidities anticipated surgical disturbance warrant specialty consultation. There may be uncertainty as to optimal processes a given patient, limitation attributable myriad factors, not least which is that there often paucity evidence directly relevant in setting. The present article discusses these limitations describes framework documentation, optimization, risk assessment, planning, well uniform grading perioperative disturbances patients requiring integrated assessment

参考文章(50)
What Are the Consequences John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 57- 62 ,(2006) , 10.1002/0470030232.CH5
Kim A Eagle, Peter B Berger, Hugh Calkins, Bernard R Chaitman, Gordon A Ewy, Kirsten E Fleischmann, Lee A Fleisher, James B Froehlich, Richard J Gusberg, Jeffrey A Leppo, Thomas Ryan, Robert C Schlant, William L Winters, Raymond J Gibbons, Elliott M Antman, Joseph S Alpert, David P Faxon, Valentin Fuster, Gabriel Gregoratos, Alice K Jacobs, Loren F Hiratzka, Richard O Russell, Sidney C Smith, None, ACC/AHA Guideline Update for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery—Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Journal of the American College of Cardiology. ,vol. 39, pp. 542- 553 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01788-0
William R Best, Shukri F Khuri, Maureen Phelan, Kwan Hur, William G Henderson, John G Demakis, Jennifer Daley, Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Journal of The American College of Surgeons. ,vol. 194, pp. 257- 266 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S1072-7515(01)01183-8
Robert I. Katz, Janice M. Barnhart, Gloria Ho, David Hersch, Stephen S. Dayan, Louis Keehn, A survey on the intended purposes and perceived utility of preoperative cardiology consultations. Anesthesia & Analgesia. ,vol. 87, pp. 830- 836 ,(1998) , 10.1097/00000539-199810000-00016
Scott K. Epstein, L. Jack Faling, Benedict D.T. Daly, Bartolome R. Celli, Predicting Complications After Pulmonary Resection: Preoperative Exercise Testing vs a Multifactorial Cardiopulmonary Risk Index Chest. ,vol. 104, pp. 694- 700 ,(1993) , 10.1378/CHEST.104.3.694
Stephen G. Pauker, Richard I. Kopelman, Interpreting Hoofbeats: Can Bayes Help Clear the Haze? New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 327, pp. 1009- 1013 ,(1992) , 10.1056/NEJM199210013271407
Finlay A McAlister, Sean van Diepen, Rajdeep S Padwal, Jeffrey A Johnson, Sumit R Majumdar, How evidence-based are the recommendations in evidence-based guidelines? PLOS Medicine. ,vol. 4, ,(2007) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.0040250
Stephen P. Fischer, Cost-effective Preoperative Evaluation and Testing Chest. ,vol. 115, pp. 96S- 100S ,(1999) , 10.1378/CHEST.115.SUPPL_2.96S
Audrey Shafer, Geoffrey K Lighthall, Perioperative Medicine: Managing for Outcome JAMA. ,vol. 302, pp. 1593- 1598 ,(2009) , 10.1001/JAMA.2009.1473