Role of Organization Structure in Innovation in the Bulk-Drug Industry
作者： Yamini Prakash Sahay , Meenakshi Gupta
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: Organization Structure & Innovations is directly under the control of organizational decision-makers to influence innovations. An organization's structure can best be studied by using perceptual measures. Hage and Aiken (1977), Daftaur (1988), Reddy (1997), Singh Pestonjee among many others, measured organization as a perceptual/ behavioural variable. The present research partly in nature. focus study on how various components an could facilitate or inhibit innovations organization. objective relationship between bulk-drug firms. Horizontal Complexity Innovation Pavitt (1994) posits that horizontal diversification presents key opportunities for new product development, specially large RD however there tension employees seek greater flexibility informal problem-solving (Shadur, Kienzle Rodwell 1999). West (2000) emphasized increased formalization system constrains innovation. Lewis, Welsh, Dehler Green (2002) found discourages idea generation due inflexibility creativity. Centralization Khandwalla (1995) decentralization has positive motivational effect over employees. Jacob (1998) "Mudra", was highly decentralized. supported high centralization negative predictor In his Vedamanickam (2001) correlation workplace innovativeness. Kanter (2004) also innovative organizations were more McNulty Ferlie consider requirement organizations. Findings Mehta indicate extensive helped To sum up; improves democratic decision-making, fosters responsiveness employees, enhances ability lower levels senior management (Samaratunge 2003); thus facilitates Concentration Authority Rothwell (1992) empowerment decision-making at reduces number approvals required decision, which adds speed efficiency development. Dunphy Bryant (1996) self-managed-teams, team members interact with each other rather than relying higher authority decisions. This increases innovation speeding process. Shavinina (2003) suggests empowered multi-functional teams are successful innovating. Participation Decision Making (1990) defines "Participative Safety" sense participate share ideas without fear, considers it important …
questia.com
jstor.org 参考文章(23)
Gary Dessler, Organization Theory: Integrating Structure and Behavior ,(1980)
Rosabeth Moss Kanter, The middle manager as innovator. Harvard Business Review. ,vol. 60, pp. 95- 105 ,(1982)
Rob Cross, Nitin Nohria, Andrew Parker, None, Six Myths About Informal Networks -- and How to Overcome Them MIT Sloan Management Review. ,vol. 43, pp. 67- 75 ,(2002)
Michael A. West, The social psychology of innovation in groups. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ,(1990)
M. W. Lewis, M. A. Welsh, G. E. Dehler, S. G. Green, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TENSIONS: EXPLORING CONTRASTING STYLES OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT Academy of Management Journal. ,vol. 45, pp. 546- 564 ,(2002) , 10.2307/3069380
Chris Bart, Innovation, mission statements and learning International Journal of Technology Management. ,vol. 27, pp. 544- 561 ,(2004) , 10.1504/IJTM.2004.004901
Roy Rothwell, Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s R & D Management. ,vol. 22, pp. 221- 240 ,(1992) , 10.1111/J.1467-9310.1992.TB00812.X
Nachoem M. Wijnberg, Jan van den Ende, Onno de Wit, Decision Making at Different Levels of the Organization and the Impact of New Information Technology: Two Cases from the Financial Sector Group & Organization Management. ,vol. 27, pp. 408- 429 ,(2002) , 10.1177/1059601102027003005
Terry McNulty, Ewan Ferlie, Process Transformation: Limitations to Radical Organizational Change within Public Service Organizations Organization Studies. ,vol. 25, pp. 1389- 1412 ,(2004) , 10.1177/0170840604046349
Anat Drach-Zahavy, Anit Somech, Michal Granot, Ada Spitzer, Can we win them all? Benefits and costs of structured and flexible innovation- implementations Journal of Organizational Behavior. ,vol. 25, pp. 217- 234 ,(2004) , 10.1002/JOB.239