Root fracture detection on digital images: effect of the zoom function.

作者: Suwadee Kositbowornchai , Supaporn Sikram , Rattanon Nuansakul , Bandit Thinkhamrop

DOI: 10.1034/J.1600-9657.2003.00158.X

关键词:

摘要: - Objectives: To assess the accuracy of root fracture detection at various levels image magnification. Methods: Extracted single-rooted human teeth (100 non-fractured and 101 fractured) were mounted singly in wax blocks a charge-coupled device (CCD)-based digital Sidexis imaging system was used to take images using paralleling technique. Image sizes 1 : 1, 2 : 1, 1 : 2 prepared for each tooth. All 603 examined randomly interpreted by an experienced radiologist unaware which fractured roots. The degree agreement between interpretation actual condition estimated kappa statistic. A modified goodness-of-fit χ2-test significance difference three sizes. sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, likelihood ratio evaluate level magnification. pairs viewing conditions also calculated statistic. Results: There substantial both 1 : 1 but only moderate 2 : 1 size. values (and 95% CIs) 0.65 (0.51–0.79), 0.63 (0.49–0.77), 0.58 (0.44–0.72), respectively. differences not statistically significant (P-value = 0.79). sensitivity (95% CI) magnification ranged 79.0% (70.0–87.5%) 81.0% (72.2–87.5%). size gave highest specificity 86.1% CI: 78.1–91.6%). positive 1 : 2, 84.9% (76.3–90.8%), 81.8% (73.1–88.2%), 77.9% (69.0–84.8%), negative 80.6% (72.1–86.9%), 81.4% (73.8–88.9%), 80.4% (71.4–87.1%) sizes, ratios test 5.70 (3.47–9.36), 4.55 (3.00–6.98), 3.56 (2.45–5,16) 0.24 (0.17–0.36), 0.23 (0.15–0.35), 0.25 (0.16–0.37) reliability substantial. statistics 0.80 (0.72–0.88), 0.73 (0.64–0.83), 0.77 (0.68–0.86), respectively. Conclusion: In this in vitro study, magnifications did affect fractures.

参考文章(38)
A Møystad, D B Svanaes, T A Larheim, H G Gröndahl, The effect of cathode ray tube display format on observer performance in dental digitized radiography: comparison with plain films. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. ,vol. 23, pp. 206- 210 ,(1994) , 10.1259/DMFR.23.4.7835525
Munetaka Naitoh, Hidemichi Yuasa, Masahiko Toyama, Masaru Shiojima, Moriatsu Nakamura, Masayuki Ushida, Hiroto Iida, Masanori Hayashi, Eiichiro Ariji, Observer agreement in the detection of proximal caries with direct digital intraoral radiography. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. ,vol. 85, pp. 107- 112 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90407-3
Gunilla Tronje, Willam D. McDavid, S.Brent Dove, Ann-Catherine Mörner, Torsten Cederlund, Ulf Welander, Per Nelvig, Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. ,vol. 75, pp. 506- 516 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0030-4220(93)90180-C
Donald D. Antrim, Reading the radiograph: A comparison of viewing techniques Journal of Endodontics. ,vol. 9, pp. 502- 505 ,(1983) , 10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80167-8
Barry Blesser, David Ozonoff, A Model for the Radiologic Process Radiology. ,vol. 103, pp. 515- 521 ,(1972) , 10.1148/103.3.515
Th. W. Jensen, Image Perception in Dental Radiography Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. ,vol. 9, pp. 37- 40 ,(1980) , 10.1259/DMFR.1980.0008
S Kositbowornchai, S Sikram, S Saengmontri, S Sinahawattana, R Nuansakul, Root fracture detection: a comparison of direct digital radiography with conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. ,vol. 30, pp. 106- 109 ,(2001) , 10.1038/SJ/DMFR/4600587
Audrey Joy Furkart, S. Brent Dove, William D. McDavid, Pirkka Nummikoski, Stephen Matteson, Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. ,vol. 74, pp. 652- 660 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0030-4220(92)90361-S
S C White, D C Yoon, Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. ,vol. 26, pp. 32- 38 ,(1997) , 10.1038/SJ.DMFR.4600208
A.H Forgie, C.M Pine, C Longbottom, N.B Pitts, The use of magnification in general dental practice in Scotland--a survey report. Journal of Dentistry. ,vol. 27, pp. 497- 502 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00030-5