Exclusive dealing with imperfect downstream competition

作者: Jose Miguel Abito , Julian Wright

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJINDORG.2006.11.004

关键词:

摘要: The existing literature on exclusive dealing is extended to take into account that buyers signing deals are typically competing firms differentiated from the perspective of their customers. We show, provided such downstream not too or upstream can compete in two-part tariffs, forecloses entry a more efficient rival. An established firm and raise joint profit by protect industry competition. Naked exclusion arises despite Chicago School logic only sign contracts make themselves (jointly) better off.

参考文章(14)
Ilya R Segal, Michael D Whinston, Naked Exclusion: Comment The American Economic Review. ,vol. 90, pp. 296- 309 ,(2000) , 10.1257/AER.90.1.296
Martin Shubik, Richard Levitan, Market structure and behavior ,(1980)
Richard A. Posner, Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective ,(1976)
Oliver Hart, Jean Tirole, Dennis W. Carlton, Oliver E. Williamson, Vertical integration and market foreclosure Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics. ,vol. 1990, pp. 205- 286 ,(1990) , 10.2307/2534783
Eric Bennett Rasmusen, John Shepard Wiley Jr., J. Mark Ramseyer, Naked Exclusion: A Reply Social Science Research Network. ,(1999)
Nirvikar Singh, Xavier Vives, Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly The RAND Journal of Economics. ,vol. 15, pp. 546- 554 ,(1984) , 10.2307/2555525
John Simpson, Abraham L Wickelgren, Naked exclusion, efficient breach, and downstream competition The American Economic Review. ,vol. 97, pp. 1305- 1320 ,(2007) , 10.1257/AER.97.4.1305
Julian Wright, Naked Exclusion and the Anticompetitive Accommodation of Entry Social Science Research Network. ,(2006) , 10.2139/SSRN.937863
Patrick Rey, Thibaud Verge, Bilateral control with vertical contracts The RAND Journal of Economics. ,vol. 35, pp. 728- 746 ,(2004) , 10.2307/1593770