Preventive home visits to elderly people: Their effectiveness cannot be judged by randomised controlled trials

作者: J Clark

DOI: 10.1136/BMJ.323.7315.708

关键词:

摘要: Papers p 719 In preventive health services the old axiom that lack of evidence is not important. No one should be surprised meta-analysis undertaken by Elkan et al (p 719), systematic reviews Stuck and van Haastregt al, randomised controlled trials these other researchers produce apparently conflicting results.1-3 Most importantly, a clear justification for home visits to older people, in terms outcomes mortality, institutionalisation, particular measures function, used as an excuse discontinuing service. Some limitations meta-analyses were identified correspondence followed publication Haastregt's review.3 The reliance approaches on recognises such are most rigorous form assessing effectiveness medical interventions but fails recognise they may adequate or appropriate …

参考文章(5)
E. Murphy, With respect to old age. BMJ. ,vol. 318, pp. 681- 682 ,(1999) , 10.1136/BMJ.318.7185.681
Diane B McNaughton, A Synthesis of Qualitative Home Visiting Research Public Health Nursing. ,vol. 17, pp. 405- 414 ,(2000) , 10.1046/J.1525-1446.2000.00405.X
R. Elkan, D. Kendrick, M. Dewey, M. Hewitt, J. Robinson, M. Blair, D. Williams, K. Brummell, M. Egger, Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ. ,vol. 323, pp. 719- 725 ,(2001) , 10.1136/BMJ.323.7315.719
A.E Stuck, A.L Siu, G.D Wieland, L.Z Rubenstein, J Adams, Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials The Lancet. ,vol. 342, pp. 1032- 1036 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-V
Jolanda CM van Haastregt, Jos PM Diederiks, Erik van Rossum, Luc P de Witte, Harry FJM Crebolder, Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people living in the community: systematic review BMJ. ,vol. 320, pp. 754- 758 ,(2000) , 10.1136/BMJ.320.7237.754