A preliminary model of wheelchair service delivery.

作者: Sara L. Eggers , Larissa Myaskovsky , Kelly H. Burkitt , Michelle Tolerico , Galen E. Switzer

DOI: 10.1016/J.APMR.2008.12.007

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Eggers SL, Myaskovsky L, Burkitt KH, Tolerico M, Switzer GE, Fine MJ, Boninger ML. A preliminary model of wheelchair service delivery. Objective To integrate and expand on previously published models delivery, provide a framework for developing more comprehensive, descriptive delivery adults with spinal cord injury within the U.S. health care system. Design Literature review qualitative analysis in-depth interviews. Setting Not applicable. Participants Ten academic, clinical, regulatory, industry experts (Department Veterans Affairs [VA] non-VA) in Interventions Main Outcome Measures Interviewees were asked to discuss full range variables stakeholders involved limit their scope provision primary subsequent or replacement chairs (not backup chairs) United States. Results Most we interviewed stressed that clients who require play central role process. Providers (including clinicians, rehabilitation engineers, counselors) are also critical stakeholders. More so than other settings, suppliers an integral wheelchairs may significantly influence appropriateness provided. Suppliers often have direct through interactions clinician and/or client. This identified number system-level factors facility administration standards, policies, regulations) ultimately Conclusions We developed detailed, integrates process device outcomes, includes patient-level, provider-level, directly those processes outcomes. believe this detailed can help clinicians researchers describe consider complexities It be used identify related disparities prescribed. Further, intervene reduce such disparities.

参考文章(46)
D. P. VanSickle, Brad Lawrence, Rory A. Cooper, R. N. Robertson, J. Gonzalez, T. Heil, S. J. Albright, Life-cycle analysis of depot versus rehabilitation manual wheelchairs. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. ,vol. 33, pp. 45- 55 ,(1996)
Crystal E. Kemp, Howard P. Parette, Barriers to Minority Family Involvement in Assistive Technology Decision-Making Processes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities. ,vol. 35, ,(2000)
Michael L Boninger, Susan Johnson-Taylor, Shari L McDowell, Theresa Chase, Robert L Waters, Ronald J Gironda, Barry Goldstein, Marcel Pj M Dijkers, Harris Gellman, Alicia M Koontz, Preservation of upper limb function following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. Maney Publishing. ,(2005)
Albert M. Cook, Janice Miller Polgar, Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice ,(1995)
Millett Granger Morgan, Max Henrion, Mitchell Small, Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis ,(1990)
Alison Kittel, Allie Di Marco, Hugh Stewart, Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 24, pp. 106- 114 ,(2002) , 10.1080/09638280110066785
C Donnelly, J J Eng, J Hall, L Alford, R Giachino, K Norton, D S Kerr, Client-centred assessment and the identification of meaningful treatment goals for individuals with a spinal cord injury Spinal Cord. ,vol. 42, pp. 302- 307 ,(2004) , 10.1038/SJ.SC.3101589
Bernard E. Leduc, Yves Lepage, Health-related quality of life after spinal cord injury Disability and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 24, pp. 196- 202 ,(2002) , 10.1080/09638280110067603
Béatrice P. J. Dijcks, Roelof D. Wessels, Suzanne L. M. de Vlieger, Marcel W. M. Post, KWAZO, a new instrument to assess the quality of service delivery in assistive technology provision Disability and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 28, pp. 909- 914 ,(2006) , 10.1080/09638280500301527