Amazon Fund 10 Years Later: Lessons from the World’s Largest REDD+ Program

作者: Juliano Correa , Richard van der Hoff , Raoni Rajão

DOI: 10.3390/F10030272

关键词:

摘要: Results-Based Funding (RBF) for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) has become an important instrument channeling financial resources to forest conservation activities. At the same time, much literature on funding is ambiguous about effectiveness of existing RBF schemes. Many evaluations follow a simplified version principal-agent model, but in practice, relation between aid providers recipients more complex. As consequence, intermediary steps are often not accounted studies. This research paper aims provide nuanced understanding by analyzing allocation one largest schemes REDD+ world: Brazilian Amazon Fund. part this analysis, study built dataset information, with unprecedented detail, Fund projects, order accurately reconstruct across different stakeholders (i.e., governments, NGOs, institutions), geographies, The results show that distribution lack clear strategy could maximize fund terms deforestation reduction. First, there evidences some cases governmental organizations additionality their which renders growing share type stakeholder particularly worrisome. Second, allocations did also systematically have privileged municipalities showed recent highest rates. rom 10 higher rates 2017, only 2 amongst top 100 receiving per/Ha considering 775 Legal Amazon. Third, reflects support projects adopt significantly diverging theories change, many primarily concerned attaining further reductions. These reflect current approach adopted Fund, do actively seek areas intervention, instead wait project submissions proponents. owners exert influence activities they how reduction expected be attained. article concludes as well other programs, should evolve over time develop targeted long-term impact reducing emissions deforestation.

参考文章(42)
Janice Weatherley-Singh, Aarti Gupta, Drivers of deforestation and REDD+ benefit-sharing: A meta-analysis of the (missing) link Environmental Science & Policy. ,vol. 54, pp. 97- 105 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2015.06.017
Daniel C. Miller, Arun Agrawal, J. Timmons Roberts, Biodiversity, Governance, and the Allocation of International Aid for Conservation Conservation Letters. ,vol. 6, pp. 12- 20 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2012.00270.X
Alexander Pfaff, Juan Robalino, Diego Herrera, Catalina Sandoval, Protected Areas’ Impacts on Brazilian Amazon Deforestation: Examining Conservation – Development Interactions to Inform Planning PLOS ONE. ,vol. 10, pp. e0129460- ,(2015) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0129460
Javier Nori, Julián N. Lescano, Patricia Illoldi-Rangel, Nicolás Frutos, Mario R. Cabrera, Gerardo C. Leynaud, The conflict between agricultural expansion and priority conservation areas: Making the right decisions before it is too late Biological Conservation. ,vol. 159, pp. 507- 513 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2012.11.020
Richard van der Hoff, Raoni Rajão, Pieter Leroy, Daan Boezeman, The parallel materialization of REDD+ implementation discourses in Brazil Forest Policy and Economics. ,vol. 55, pp. 37- 45 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.FORPOL.2015.03.005
Arild Vatn, Paul O. Vedeld, National governance structures for REDD Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 23, pp. 422- 432 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2012.11.005
B. Soares-Filho, P. Moutinho, D. Nepstad, A. Anderson, H. Rodrigues, R. Garcia, L. Dietzsch, F. Merry, M. Bowman, L. Hissa, R. Silvestrini, C. Maretti, Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 107, pp. 10821- 10826 ,(2010) , 10.1073/PNAS.0913048107
Sérgio Sauer, Franciney Carreiro de França, Código Florestal, função socioambiental da terra e soberania alimentar Caderno Crh. ,vol. 25, pp. 285- 307 ,(2012) , 10.1590/S0103-49792012000200007