Differences in the in vitro and in vivo 5-hydroxytryptamine extraction performance among three common microdialysis membranes.

作者: Rui Tao , Stephan Hjorth

DOI: 10.1111/J.1471-4159.1992.TB11010.X

关键词:

摘要: : The present study summarizes the results of an in vitro and vivo comparison apparent 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid dialysis performance three types membrane frequently used intracerebral microdialysis experiments. fiber examined were a regenerated cellulose Cuprophan (GF), proprietary polycarbonate ether (CMA), polyacrylonitrile/sodium methallylsulfonate copolymer (HOSPAL). experiments unexpectedly revealed that HOSPAL membrane-equipped probes displayed clearly aberrant 5-HT diffusion dynamics compared with GF CMA probes, demonstrable not only vitro, but also In exhibited maximum relative recovery for already first 20-min sample, whereas increased very slow protracted manner over period little less than 2 h. further immediate washout when subsequently transferred to artificial CSF only-containing medium (no 5-HT), sim h was required yield near-total extinction dialysate standard probes. vivo, rat ventral hippocampal output responses K+ (100 mM) infusion, Ca2+ omission, systemic 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin injection all markedly retarded blunted instead used. However, extraction comparable using either types. findings are discussed terms interaction between cationic negative ionic charges membrane. anomalous shown be dependent on exposed surface area (and thus probe design), may influenced by changing perfusion flow rate or strength media in- outside probe. Our seriously caution against uncritically any without controlling its properties within context application intended. particular, usefulness at physiological pH limited.

参考文章(21)
E. Carboni, G. Di Chiara, Serotonin release estimated by transcortical dialysis in freely-moving rats Neuroscience. ,vol. 32, pp. 637- 645 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0306-4522(89)90285-6
Tom J. Parry, Troy L. Carter, James G. McElligott, Physical and chemical considerations in the in vitro calibration of microdialysis probes for biogenic amine neurotransmitters and metabolites Journal of Neuroscience Methods. ,vol. 32, pp. 175- 183 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0165-0270(90)90138-6
Ronald D. Johnson, Joseph B. Justice, Model studies for brain dialysis. Brain Research Bulletin. ,vol. 10, pp. 567- 571 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0361-9230(83)90156-9
Gustav Amberg, Nils Lindefors, Intracerebral microdialysis: II. Mathematical studies of diffusion kinetics. Journal of Pharmacological Methods. ,vol. 22, pp. 157- 183 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0160-5402(89)90012-0
Trevor Sharp, Stephan Hjorth, Application of brain microdialysis to study the pharmacology of the 5-HT1A autoreceptor. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. ,vol. 34, pp. 83- 90 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0165-0270(90)90045-H
Helene Benveniste, Anker Jon Hansen, Niels Saabye Ottosen, Determination of Brain Interstitial Concentrations by Microdialysis Journal of Neurochemistry. ,vol. 52, pp. 1741- 1750 ,(1989) , 10.1111/J.1471-4159.1989.TB07252.X
Helene Benveniste, Peter Christian Hüttemeier, Microdialysis—Theory and application Progress in Neurobiology. ,vol. 35, pp. 195- 215 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0301-0082(90)90027-E
Peter M. Bungay, Paul F. Morrison, Robert L. Dedrick, Steady-state theory for quantitative microdialysis of solutes and water in vivo and in vitro. Life Sciences. ,vol. 46, pp. 105- 119 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0024-3205(90)90043-Q
Nils Lindefors, Gustav Amberg, Urban Ungerstedt, Intracerebral microdialysis: I. Experimental studies of diffusion kinetics. Journal of Pharmacological Methods. ,vol. 22, pp. 141- 156 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0160-5402(89)90011-9