Inclusion of MUC1 (Ma695) in a panel of immunohistochemical markers is useful for distinguishing between endocervical and endometrial mucinous adenocarcinoma

作者: Thaer Khoury , Dongfeng Tan , Jianmin Wang , Marilyn Intengan , Jun Yang

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6890-6-1

关键词:

摘要: Distinguishing endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA) from endometrial mucinous (EMMA) is clinically significant in view of the differences their management and prognosis. In this study, we used a panel tumor markers to determine ability distinguish between primary adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies MUC1 (Ma695), p16, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone (PR), vimentin, was performed examine 32 cases, including 18 EMMAs 14 ECAs. For MUC1, cases were scored based on percentage staining pattern, apical, apical cytoplasmic (A/C), or negative. cells stained. rest antibodies, semiquantitative scoring system carried out. majority EMMA (14 78%) showed A/C staining, whereas only few ECA (2 14, 14%) positive. The difference expression two groups malignancy statistically (p < 0.001). Staining for p16 positive 10 (71%) 4 (22%) EMMA. Estrogen 3 (21%) 17 (94%) Progesterone 16 (89%) Vimentin 1 (7%) ECA, 9 (50%) EMA, with median range 0 (0–6), 1.5 (0–9) respectively. A immunohistochemical ER, PR, vimentin recommended, when there morphological clinical doubt as site origin.

参考文章(37)
David J Dabbs, Kraig Sturtz, Richard J Zaino, The immunohistochemical discrimination of endometrioid adenocarcinomas Human Pathology. ,vol. 27, pp. 172- 177 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0046-8177(96)90371-8
Jan Dekker, John W.A. Rossen, Hans A. Büller, Alexandra W.C. Einerhand, The MUC family: an obituary Trends in Biochemical Sciences. ,vol. 27, pp. 126- 131 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0968-0004(01)02052-7
Seiryu Kamoi, Muna I. AlJuboury, Marie-Rose Akin, Steven G. Silverberg, Immunohistochemical staining in the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas: another viewpoint. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. ,vol. 21, pp. 217- 223 ,(2002) , 10.1097/00004347-200207000-00003
W.R. Brewster, Bradley J. Monk, Robert A. Burger, Susanne Bergen, Sharon P. Wilczynski, Does Human Papillomavirus Have a Role in Cancers of the Uterine Corpus Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 75, pp. 51- 54 ,(1999) , 10.1006/GYNO.1999.5534
M Ali Ansari-Lari, Annette Staebler, Richard J Zaino, Keerti V Shah, Brigitte M Ronnett, Distinction of endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas: immunohistochemical p16 expression correlated with human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. ,vol. 28, pp. 160- 167 ,(2004) , 10.1097/00000478-200402000-00002
Daniel D Carson, Mary M DeSouza, Rachele Kardon, Xinhui Zhou, Errin Lagow, JoAnne Julian, Mucin expression and function in the female reproductive tract Human Reproduction Update. ,vol. 4, pp. 459- 464 ,(1998) , 10.1093/HUMUPD/4.5.459
Ruediger Klaes, Tibor Friedrich, Dimitry Spitkovsky, Ruediger Ridder, Wolfgang Rudy, Ulrich Petry, Gisela Dallenbach-Hellweg, Dietmar Schmidt, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, Overexpression of p16INK4A as a specific marker for dysplastic and neoplastic epithelial cells of the cervix uteri International Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 92, pp. 276- 284 ,(2001) , 10.1002/IJC.1174
W. Glenn McCluggage, V. Palaniappan Sumathi, Hilary A. McBride, Anna Patterson, A panel of immunohistochemical stains, including carcinoembryonic antigen, vimentin, and estrogen receptor, aids the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. ,vol. 21, pp. 11- 15 ,(2002) , 10.1097/00004347-200201000-00003
Rüdiger Klaes, Axel Benner, Tibor Friedrich, Rüdiger Ridder, Simon Herrington, David Jenkins, Robert J. Kurman, Dietmar Schmidt, Mark Stoler, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, p16INK4a immunohistochemistry improves interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. ,vol. 26, pp. 1389- 1399 ,(2002) , 10.1097/00000478-200211000-00001