Evaluation of selected ultralight manual wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards.

摘要: Abstract Objectives: To provide data for clinicians and wheelchair users to compare the durability, strength, stability, cost effectiveness of four different ultralight models, results this study with those published lightweight wheelchairs. Design: Standards testing cost-effectiveness analysis models from manufacturers (12 wheelchairs total). Results: There were significant differences ( p ≤ .05) in fatigue life value (equivalent cycles per dollar) among tested. was also a difference rearward stability tilt angle least most stable configurations. no forward lateral stability. The (1,009,108 cycles) had significantly higher lives than previously reported (187,370 cycles). mean 210 dollar compared 673 statistically .05). Conclusion: manual This indicates that are not all equal quality. may be quality Clinicians consumers should seriously consider selecting an meet their mobility needs.