Evaluation of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair.

作者: Rory A. Cooper , Shirley G. Fitzgerald , Michael L. Boninger , Karin Prins , Andrew J. Rentschler

DOI: 10.1053/APMR.2001.20836

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Cooper RA, Fitzgerald SG, Boninger ML, Prins K, Rentschler AJ, Arva J, O'Connor TJ. Evaluation of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:702-8. Objective: To evaluate novel wheelchair (PAPAW) for compliance with standards, metabolic energy cost during propulsion, and ergonomics selected activities daily living (ADLs). Design: A 3-phase study, the second third which were repeated-measures designs. Setting: rehabilitation engineering center within Veterans Affairs medical center. Patients: Eleven full-time, community-dwelling, manual users (4 women, 6 men) spinal cord injuries or multiple sclerosis. Interventions: Phase 1: Compliance testing, test dummy, in accordance standards American National Standards Institute Rehabilitation Engineering Assistive Technology Society North America. 2: Metabolic consumption testing—at 2 speeds 3 resistance levels—in subjects' PAPAW. 3: ability to perform ADLs PAPAW compared subjects personal Main Outcome Measures: The PAPAW's static stability, strength, impact fatigue environmental response, obstacle climbing ability, range, maximum speed, braking distance. Subjects' oxygen per minute, minute ventilation, heart rate different workloads their own wheelchairs. Subject ratings perceived comfort basic while performing ADLs. Completion time, stroke frequency, each ADL. Results: was found be standards. With PAPAW, user had significantly lower (VO mL/min: p mL/kg × min: =.001), receiving ratings. Conclusion: This study indicated that is compliant reduces demand placed on rated its favorably when PAPAWs may provide wheelchairs less physiologically stressful means mobility few adaptations vehicle home environment. © 2001 by Congress Medicine Academy Physical

参考文章(22)
E Botden, DirkJan Veeger, I Vriend, L H van der Woude, Mechanical advantage in wheelchair lever propulsion : effect on physical strain and efficiency Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. ,vol. 34, pp. 286- 294 ,(1997)
D P VanSickle, K J Stewart, R A Cooper, R N Robertson, M Flannery, S J Albright, Power wheelchair range testing and energy consumption during fatigue testing. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. ,vol. 32, pp. 255- 263 ,(1995)
D. P. VanSickle, Brad Lawrence, Rory A. Cooper, R. N. Robertson, J. Gonzalez, T. Heil, S. J. Albright, Life-cycle analysis of depot versus rehabilitation manual wheelchairs. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. ,vol. 33, pp. 45- 55 ,(1996)
R. A. Cooper, J. Bach, M. Alexander, W. Harlan, H. Chambers, J. S. Krause, E. Y. S. Chao, P. W. Axelson, L. A. Quatrano, M. Stineman, P. Painter, B. Franklin, Research on physical activity and health among people with disabilities: a consensus statement. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. ,vol. 36, pp. 142- 154 ,(1999)
Ennis, Nichols Pj, Norman Pa, Wheelchair user's shoulder? Shoulder pain in patients with spinal cord lesions. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. ,vol. 11, pp. 29- 32 ,(1979)
Rodney H. Adkins, Ien H. Sie, Robert L. Waters, Harris Gellman, Upper extremity pain in the postrehabilitation spinal cord injured patient. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 73, pp. 44- 48 ,(1992) , 10.5555/URI:PII:000399939290225L
H. E. J. VEEGER, L. H. V. VAN DER WOUDE, R. H. ROZENDAL, Effect of handrim velocity on mechanical efficiency in wheelchair propulsion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. ,vol. 24, pp. 100- 107 ,(1992) , 10.1249/00005768-199201000-00017
Rory A. Cooper, Michael L. Boninger, Andrew Rentschler, Evaluation of selected ultralight manual wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 80, pp. 462- 467 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90287-3