Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw?

作者: THOMAS HORSLEY

DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-5965.2011.02221.X

关键词:

摘要: This article reviews the evolution of subsidiarity as a constitutional principle within case law European Court Justice. It argues that, to date, discussion judicial remains narrowly focused on its impact restraint Union legislature. In an effort steer debate in another direction, this revisits and supports arguments favour applying brake Court's own interpretative functions. Thereafter, it isolates interpretation Treaty free movement provisions empirical example test underdeveloped dimension subsidiarity.

参考文章(13)
Garreth Davies, Subsidiarity: The wrong idea, in the wrong place, at the wrong time Common Market Law Review. ,vol. 43, pp. 63- 84 ,(2006)
Alan Dashwood, The relationship between the Member States and the European Union/European Community Common Market Law Review. ,vol. 41, pp. 355- 381 ,(2004)
Robert Schütze, SUBSIDIARITY AFTER LISBON: REINFORCING THE SAFEGUARDS OF FEDERALISM? Cambridge Law Journal. ,vol. 68, pp. 525- 536 ,(2009) , 10.1017/S0008197309990183
Nicolas Bernard, The Future of European Economic Law in the Light of the Principle of Subsidiarity Common Market Law Review. ,vol. 33, pp. 633- 666 ,(1996)
T. Schilling, A New Dimension of Subsidiarity: Subsidiarity as a Rule and a Principle Yearbook of European Law. ,vol. 14, pp. 203- 255 ,(1994) , 10.1093/YEL/14.1.203