The Analytic Network Process
作者： Thomas L Saaty , Luis G Vargas , Thomas L Saaty , Luis G Vargas
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7_1
关键词:
摘要: Analysis to break down a problem into its constituent components study their behavior has been the major tool of scientific inquiry test hypotheses and solve problems. It proven be extremely successful in dealing with world matter energy. enabled man land on moon, harness energy atom, master global communication, invent computer produce tens thousands useful not so things. But it effective man.
springer.com
iors.ir
researchgate.net 参考文章(27)
THOMAS L. SAATY, KEVIN P. KEARNS, CHAPTER 2 – Systems Analytical Planning#R##N#The Organization of System. pp. 12- 18 ,(1985) , 10.1016/B978-0-08-032599-6.50007-6
Thomas L. Saaty, Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Springer Netherlands. pp. 15- 35 ,(2001) , 10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2
Fred S. Roberts, Measurement theory with applications to decisionmaking, utility, and the social sciences ,(1979)
Thomas L. Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process ,(2000)
J. Aczél, T.L. Saaty, Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements Journal of Mathematical Psychology. ,vol. 27, pp. 93- 102 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0022-2496(83)90028-7
Thomas L. Saaty, Decision making for leaders systems man and cybernetics. ,vol. 15, pp. 450- 452 ,(1985) , 10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313384
Kevin W. S. Roberts, Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory The Review of Economic Studies. ,vol. 47, pp. 421- 439 ,(1980) , 10.2307/2297002
C.R. Barrett, Prasanta K. Pattanaik, M. Salles, Rationality and aggregation of preferences in an ordinally fuzzy framework Fuzzy Sets and Systems. ,vol. 49, pp. 9- 13 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0165-0114(92)90105-D
John F. Nash, The Bargaining Problem Econometrica. ,vol. 18, pp. 155- 162 ,(1950) , 10.2307/1907266
Thomas L Saaty, A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures Journal of Mathematical Psychology. ,vol. 15, pp. 234- 281 ,(1977) , 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5