Tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer

作者: A Lugli , E Karamitopoulou , I Zlobec

DOI: 10.1038/BJC.2012.127

关键词:

摘要: In 2011, the Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system still remains gold standard for stratifying colorectal cancer (CRC) patients into prognostic subgroups, and is considered a solid basis treatment management. Nevertheless, there challenge with regard to therapeutic strategy; stage II are not typically selected postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, although some have comparable outcome III who, themselves do receive such treatment. Consequently, has been an inundation of 'prognostic biomarker' studies aiming improve stratification power TNM system. Most proposed biomarkers implemented because lack reproducibility, validation standardisation. This problem can be partially resolved by following REMARK guidelines. search novel factors CRC, one might glance at table in book entitled 'Prognostic Factors Cancer' published International Union against Cancer (UICC) 2006, which stage, L V classifications 'essential' factors, whereas tumour grade, perineural invasion, budding tumour-border configuration among others as 'additional' factors. Histopathology reports normally include features accompanied histological subtype information on but interestingly, (i.e., growth pattern) especially rarely reported. Although scoring systems 'BRE' breast 'Gleason' prostate solidly based histomorphological used daily practice, no additional complement available CRC. Regardless differences study design methods tumour-budding assessment, confirmed dozens groups worldwide, suggesting that may valuable candidate inclusion future mini-review therefore attempts present short concise overview budding, including morphological, molecular aspects underlining its inter-disciplinary relevance.

参考文章(27)
Otto Schmalhofer, Simone Brabletz, Thomas Brabletz, E-cadherin, beta-catenin, and ZEB1 in malignant progression of cancer. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews. ,vol. 28, pp. 151- 166 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S10555-008-9179-Y
H Ueno, J Murphy, J R Jass, H Mochizuki, I C Talbot, Tumour `budding' as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer Histopathology. ,vol. 40, pp. 127- 132 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1365-2559.2002.01324.X
Lai Mun Wang, David Kevans, Hugh Mulcahy, Jacintha OʼSullivan, David Fennelly, John Hyland, Diarmuid OʼDonoghue, Kieran Sheahan, Tumor budding is a strong and reproducible prognostic marker in T3N0 colorectal cancer. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. ,vol. 33, pp. 134- 141 ,(2009) , 10.1097/PAS.0B013E318184CD55
Olivier T Giger, Sarah C M Comtesse, Alessandro Lugli, Inti Zlobec, Michael O Kurrer, Intra-tumoral budding in preoperative biopsy specimens predicts lymph node and distant metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer Modern Pathology. ,vol. 25, pp. 1048- 1053 ,(2012) , 10.1038/MODPATHOL.2012.56
Raghu Kalluri, EMT: when epithelial cells decide to become mesenchymal-like cells. Journal of Clinical Investigation. ,vol. 119, pp. 1417- 1419 ,(2009) , 10.1172/JCI39675
Masafumi Tanaka, Yojiro Hashiguchi, Hideki Ueno, Kazuo Hase, Hidetaka Mochizuki, Tumor Budding at the Invasive Margin Can Predict Patients at High Risk of Recurrence After Curative Surgery for Stage II, T3 Colon Cancer Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 46, pp. 1054- 1059 ,(2003) , 10.1007/S10350-004-7280-Z
Yoko Tateishi, Yukihiro Nakanishi, Hirokazu Taniguchi, Tadakazu Shimoda, Satoshi Umemura, Pathological prognostic factors predicting lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive (T1) colorectal carcinoma. Modern Pathology. ,vol. 23, pp. 1068- 1072 ,(2010) , 10.1038/MODPATHOL.2010.88