Nanomaterial risk screening: a structured approach to aid decision making under uncertainty
作者： Christian E. H. Beaudrie , Milind Kandlikar , Robin Gregory , Graham Long , Tim Wilson
DOI: 10.1007/S10669-014-9529-Y
关键词:
摘要: The responsible development of new nanomaterials and nano-enabled products requires that potential risks are understood managed before harms occur. Although quantitative predictive tools for anticipating human health environmental risk in early stages development, there is a clear need screening methodologies to inform decision making related nanomaterial management regulatory agencies industry. This paper presents the results two-day workshop with nanotechnology experts aimed at developing risk-screening framework nanomaterials. Drawing upon expertise nanotoxicology, exposure, fate transport, structured making, participants developed support relating key physicochemical product characteristics important hazard exposure indicators. Application preliminary nano-risk-screening tool (NRST) several test cases illustrates utility approach both identifying drive highlighting opportunities redesign minimize risks. aiding managers’ decisions under uncertainty provides foundation transparent adaptable can
springer.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(55)
M. Granger Morgan, Louis F. Pitelka, Elena Shevliakova, Elicitation of Expert Judgments of Climate Change Impacts on Forest Ecosystems Climatic Change. ,vol. 49, pp. 279- 307 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1010651300697
L. Failing, R. Gregory, D. Ohlson, T. McDaniels, G. Long, M. Harstone, Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices ,(2012)
Christopher Bosso, Governing Uncertainty Routledge. ,(2010) , 10.4324/9781936331055
Millett Granger Morgan, Max Henrion, Mitchell Small, Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis ,(1990)
Mark A. Burgman, Risks and decisions for conservation and environmental management ,(2005)
Tomasz Puzyn, Danuta Leszczynska, Jerzy Leszczynski, Toward the development of "nano-QSARs": advances and challenges. Small. ,vol. 5, pp. 2494- 2509 ,(2009) , 10.1002/SMLL.200900179
Kara Morgan, Development of a preliminary framework for informing the risk analysis and risk management of nanoparticles. Risk Analysis. ,vol. 25, pp. 1621- 1635 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2005.00681.X
Andre E. Nel, Elina Nasser, Hilary Godwin, David Avery, Tina Bahadori, Lynn Bergeson, Elizabeth Beryt, James C. Bonner, Darrell Boverhof, Janet Carter, Vince Castranova, J. R. DeShazo, Saber M. Hussain, Agnes B. Kane, Frederick Klaessig, Eileen Kuempel, Mark Lafranconi, Robert Landsiedel, Timothy Malloy, Mary Beth Miller, Jeffery Morris, Kenneth Moss, Gunter Oberdorster, Kent Pinkerton, Richard C. Pleus, Jo Anne Shatkin, Russell Thomas, Thabet Tolaymat, Amy Wang, Jeffrey Wong, A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on the Use of Alternative Test Strategies for Nanomaterial Safety Assessment ACS Nano. ,vol. 7, pp. 6422- 6433 ,(2013) , 10.1021/NN4037927
Daniel Krewski, Melvin E. Andersen, Ellen Mantus, Lauren Zeise, Toxicity testing in the 21st century: implications for human health risk assessment. Risk Analysis. ,vol. 29, pp. 474- 479 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2008.01150.X
KATHERINE D WALKER, JOHN S EVANS, DAVID MACINTOSH, Use of expert judgment in exposure assessment. Part I. Characterization of personal exposure to benzene. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology. ,vol. 11, pp. 308- 322 ,(2001) , 10.1038/SJ.JEA.7500171