Graft type for femoro‐popliteal bypass surgery

作者: Nizam Mamode , Roy N Scott

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001487

关键词:

摘要: Background Vascular surgeons construct femoro-popliteal bypass grafts, from the groin to knee, save limbs that might otherwise require amputation in patients with severe arterial disease, and improve walking distance less disease. During operation, blocked native artery is bypassed using either a section of patient's own vein (autologous vein), human umbilical (HUV), or an artificial graft e.g. Dacron polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Objectives To determine most effective type for surgery. Search strategy The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Specialised Register, authors reference lists relevant articles, hand proceedings British European Surgical Societies North American Society Surgery. They also contacted all major manufacturers grafts published trials enquire about unpublished trials. Selection criteria Randomised comparing one another. Data collection analysis Both reviewers selected assessed trial quality independently. Main results Nine were included total 1334 participants. These investigated variety types. In above-knee grafting, primary secondary patency significantly better saphenous (73% 90%, respectively) compared PTFE (47%, p<0.05 47%, p<0.05) (54%, p<0.01 60%, p<0.01) at four years. Two in-situ reversed above- below-knee popliteal revealed no differences (64% v 62% respectively), (65% 70%), survival intact limb (74% both groups) five ten year follow-up. Three HUV showed rates HUV, (41% 73%, p<0.005; 49% 66%, p<0.05; 22% 42%,p=0.005) years (32% 65%, p<0.001). Comparison with, without, cuff found difference grafts. However, was higher plus (52% 29%, p=0.03) two years. Authors' conclusions There clear evidence which best grafting. In terms autologous patency, are equally successful, while performs than PTFE. A distal may

参考文章(18)
Peter Zilla, Manfred Deutsch, Johann Meinhart, Rudolf Puschmann, Thomas Eberl, Erich Minar, Robert Dudczak, Herbert Lugmaier, Peter Schmidt, Irene Noszian, Teddy Fischlein, Clinical in vitro endothelialization of femoropopliteal bypass grafts: An actuarial follow-up over three years Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 19, pp. 540- 548 ,(1994) , 10.1016/S0741-5214(94)70083-4
HUGO W. TILANUS, HUGH OBERTOP, HERO VAN URK, Saphenous vein or PTFE for femoropopliteal bypass. A prospective randomized trial. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 202, pp. 780- 782 ,(1985) , 10.1097/00000658-198512000-00020
Martin L. Schulman, An 11-Year Experience With Deep Leg Veins as Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafts Archives of Surgery. ,vol. 121, pp. 1010- 1015 ,(1986) , 10.1001/ARCHSURG.1986.01400090036006
William M. Abbott, Richard M. Green, Teruo Matsumoto, Jock R. Wheeler, Normand Miller, Frank J. Veith, William D. Suggs, Larry Hollier, Sam Money, H.Edward Garrett, Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: Results of a multicenter randomized prospective trial Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 25, pp. 19- 28 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70317-3
J. H. Eickhoff, H. J. Buchardt Hansen, A. Brommé, B. F. Ericsson, K. F. Kordt, C. Mouritzen, H. O. Myhre, L. Norgren, H. Rostad, A. Trippestad, A randomized clinical trial of PTFE versus human umbilical vein for femoropopliteal bypass surgery. Preliminary results. British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 70, pp. 85- 88 ,(2005) , 10.1002/BJS.1800700210
Jacques Watelet, Patrick Soury, Jean-François Menard, Didier Plissonnier, Christophe Peillon, Jean-Pierre Lestrat, Jacques Testart, Femoropopliteal Bypass: In Situ or Reversed Vein Grafts? Ten-Year Results of a Randomized Prospective Study Annals of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 11, pp. 510- 519 ,(1997) , 10.1007/S100169900083
Charles McCollum, Glenda Kenchington, Christine Alexander, Peter J. Franks, R.M. Greenhalgh, PTFE or HUV for femoro-popliteal bypass: A multi-centre trial* European Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 5, pp. 435- 443 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80177-X
P. L. Harris, T. V. How, D. R. Jones, Prospectively randomized clinical trial to compare in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for femoropopliteal bypass British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 74, pp. 252- 255 ,(1987) , 10.1002/BJS.1800740409
Sushil K. Gupta, Franck J. Veith, Harry B. Kram, Kurt R. Wengerter, Prospective, randomized comparison of ringed and nonringed polytetrafluoroethylene femoropopliteal bypass grafts: a preliminary report. Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 13, pp. 163- 172 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0741-5214(91)90023-N
Frank J. Veith, Sushil K. Gupta, Enrico Ascer, Sheila White-Flores, Russell H. Samson, Larry A. Scher, Jonathan B. Towne, Victor M. Bernhard, Patricia Bonier, William R. Flinn, Patricia Astelford, James S.T. Yao, John J. Bergan, Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 3, pp. 104- 114 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0741-5214(86)90073-X