Sagittal abdominal diameter as a screening tool in clinical research: cutoffs for cardiometabolic risk.

作者: U. Risérus , U. de Faire , L. Berglund , M.-L. Hellénius

DOI: 10.1155/2010/757939

关键词:

摘要: Background. Waist girth and BMI are commonly used as markers of cardiometabolic risk. Accumulating data however suggest that sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) or “abdominal height” may be a better marker intra-abdominal adiposity We aimed to identify cutoffs for SAD using risk score. Design. A population-based cross-sectional study. Methods. In 4032 subjects (1936 men 2096 women) at age 60, different anthropometric variables (SAD, BMI, waist girth, waist-to-hip ratio) were measured score calculated. ROC curves assess cutoffs. Results. Among showed the strongest correlations majority individual factors; whereas in women was equal girth. whole sample, area under curve highest SAD. The optimal cutoff an elevated 22 cm (95%CI; 21.6 22.8) 20 cm 19.4 20.8). These similar if Framingham used. Conclusions. research screening “metabolically obese” who would benefit from lifestyle pharmacological interventions. results need verified younger groups.

参考文章(43)
B. Richelsen, S. B. Pedersen, Associations between different anthropometric measurements of fatness and metabolic risk parameters in non-obese, healthy, middle-aged men. International Journal of Obesity. ,vol. 19, pp. 169- 174 ,(1995)
Williamson Df, Kahn Hs, Sagittal abdominal diameter. International Journal of Obesity. ,vol. 17, pp. 669- ,(1993)
Gloria Mazzali, Vincenzo Di Francesco, Elena Zoico, Francesco Fantin, Giulia Zamboni, Claudia Benati, Valentina Bambara, Mauro Negri, Ottavio Bosello, Mauro Zamboni, Interrelations between fat distribution, muscle lipid content, adipocytokines, and insulin resistance: effect of moderate weight loss in older women The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. ,vol. 84, pp. 1193- 1199 ,(2006) , 10.1093/AJCN/84.5.1193
Charles C Allain, Lucy S Poon, Cicely S G Chan, W Richmond, Paul C Fu, Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clinical Chemistry. ,vol. 20, pp. 470- 475 ,(1974) , 10.1093/CLINCHEM/20.4.470
H Kvist, B Chowdhury, U Grangård, U Tylén, L Sjöström, Total and visceral adipose-tissue volumes derived from measurements with computed tomography in adult men and women: predictive equations The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. ,vol. 48, pp. 1351- 1361 ,(1988) , 10.1093/AJCN/48.6.1351
Henry S. Kahn, Eduardo J. Simoes, Mark Koponen, Randy Hanzlick, The abdominal diameter index and sudden coronary death in men American Journal of Cardiology. ,vol. 78, pp. 961- 964 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00479-1
Karin Van Der Kooy, Rianne Leenen, Jaap C. Seidell, Paul Deurenberg, Marjolein Visser, Abdominal diameters as indicators of visceral fat: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometry. British Journal of Nutrition. ,vol. 70, pp. 47- 58 ,(1993) , 10.1079/BJN19930104
L. Kumlin, L. Dimberg, P. Marin, Ratio of abdominal sagittal diameter to height is strong indicator of coronary risk BMJ. ,vol. 314, pp. 830- 830 ,(1997) , 10.1136/BMJ.314.7083.830
K Nordhamn, E Södergren, E Olsson, B Karlström, B Vessby, L Berglund, Reliability of anthropometric measurements in overweight and lean subjects: consequences for correlations between anthropometric and other variables. International Journal of Obesity. ,vol. 24, pp. 652- 657 ,(2000) , 10.1038/SJ.IJO.0801216
Henry S. Kahn, Harland Austin, David F. Williamson, Daniel Arensberg, Simple anthropometric indices associated with ischemic heart disease Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 49, pp. 1017- 1024 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00113-8