Item Placement on a Personality Measure: Effects on Faking Behavior and Test Measurement Properties

作者: Lynn A. McFarland , Ann Marie Ryan , Aleksander Ellis

DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7802_09

关键词:

摘要: Although personality tests are widely used to select applicants for a variety of jobs, there is concern that such measures fakable. One procedure minimize faking has been disguise the true intent by randomizing items measuring similar constructs dispersed throughout test. In this study, we examined if item placement does influence fakability and psychometric properties measure. Study participants responded 1 2 formats (random vs. grouped items) test honestly also under instructions fake or behave like an applicant. Results indicate format was more fakable Neuroticism Conscientiousness scales. The with randomly placed fit data better within honest applicant conditions. These findings demonstrate issue should be seriously considered before administering because different presentations may affect incidence

参考文章(57)
Chester A. Schriesheim, Leniency Effects on Convergent and Discriminant Validity for Grouped Questionnaire Items: A Further Investigation Educational and Psychological Measurement. ,vol. 41, pp. 1093- 1099 ,(1981) , 10.1177/001316448104100419
Gordon W. Cheung, Roger B. Rensvold, Testing Factorial Invariance across Groups: A Reconceptualization and Proposed New Method Journal of Management. ,vol. 25, pp. 1- 27 ,(1999) , 10.1177/014920639902500101
William Meredith, Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance. Psychometrika. ,vol. 58, pp. 525- 543 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF02294825
Richard J. Budd, Response Bias and the Theory of Reasoned Action Social Cognition. ,vol. 5, pp. 95- 107 ,(1987) , 10.1521/SOCO.1987.5.2.95
James C. Hamilton, Tammy R. Shuminsky, Self-awareness mediates the relationship between serial position and item reliability Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 59, pp. 1301- 1307 ,(1990) , 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1301
George M. Alliger, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Krystin E. Mitchell, The Susceptibility of Overt and Covert Integrity Tests to Coaching and Faking Psychological Science. ,vol. 7, pp. 32- 39 ,(1996) , 10.1111/J.1467-9280.1996.TB00663.X
Michael W. Browne, Robert Cudeck, Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit Sociological Methods & Research. ,vol. 21, pp. 230- 258 ,(1992) , 10.1177/0049124192021002005
Lynn A. McFarland, Ann Marie Ryan, Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 85, pp. 812- 821 ,(2000) , 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.812