Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control--a comparison between the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States).
作者： Phyllis A. Wingo , Patricia M. Jamison , Robert A. Hiatt , Hannah K. Weir , Paul M. Gargiullo
关键词:
摘要: Objective: In preparation for jointly publishing official government cancer statistics, the Centers Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Cancer Institute (NCI) compared incidence rates from NCI's Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) program CDC's Program of Registries (NPCR). Methods: Data 1999 covering 78% US population were obtained SEER selected NPCR registries that met high quality data criteria. (per 100,000 population) age-adjusted to 2000 standard population, 95% gamma confidence intervals estimated Results: all sites combined higher than (males: 553.6, 538.7; females: 420.8, 412.5), but specific varied by registry program. Rates colon 47.0, 42.7; 36.5, 33.8) tobacco-related cancers in SEER. contrast, lower female breaset (NPCR 134.0, 135.9), prostate 162.0, 170.2), melanoma as well more common among Asians Pacific Islanders (e.g., stomach cancer).Conclusions: Rate differences may arise difference socio-demographic characteristics, screening use, health behaviors, exposure causing agents or operations factors.
springer.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(23)
Harry M. Rosenberg, Robert N. Anderson, Report of the Second Workshop on Age Adjustment. Vital and health statistics. Ser. 4, Documents and committee reports. ,(1998)
Harry M. Rosenberg, Robert N. Anderson, Age standardization of death rates: implementation of the year 2000 standard. National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. ,vol. 47, pp. 1- 20 ,(1998)
Judith Swan, Phyllis Wingo, Rosemarie Clive, Dee West, Daniel Miller, Carol Hutchison, Edward J. Sondik, Brenda K. Edwards, Cancer surveillance in the U.S.: can we have a national system? Cancer. ,vol. 83, pp. 1282- 1291 ,(1998) , 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981001)83:7<1282::AID-CNCR3>3.0.CO;2-L
Graham A. Colditz, Carolyn C. Cannuscio, A. Lindsay Frazier, Physical activity and reduced risk of colon cancer: implications for prevention Cancer Causes & Control. ,vol. 8, pp. 649- 667 ,(1997) , 10.1023/A:1018458700185
Benjamin F. Hankey, Lynn A. Ries, Brenda K. Edwards, The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. ,vol. 8, pp. 1117- 1121 ,(1999)
STEPHEN B. THACKER, RUTH L. BERKELMAN, PUBLIC HEALTH SURVEILLANCE IN THE UNITED STATES Epidemiologic Reviews. ,vol. 10, pp. 164- 190 ,(1988) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.EPIREV.A036021
Ann Butler Nattinger, Timothy L. McAuliffe, Marilyn M. Schapira, Generalizability of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry population: factors relevant to epidemiologic and health care research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 50, pp. 939- 945 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00099-1
Brenda K. Edwards, Holly L. Howe, Lynn A. G. Ries, Michael J. Thun, Harry M. Rosenberg, Rosemary Yancik, Phyllis A. Wingo, Ahmedin Jemal, Ellen G. Feigal, Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1999, featuring implications of age and aging on U.S. cancer burden Cancer. ,vol. 94, pp. 2766- 2792 ,(2002) , 10.1002/CNCR.10593
C. M. Frey, M. M. McMillen, C. D. Cowan, J. W. Horm, L. G. Kessler, Representativeness of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Data: Recent Trends in Cancer Mortality Rates Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 84, pp. 872- 877 ,(1992) , 10.1093/JNCI/84.11.872
Nathaniel Schenker, Jane F Gentleman, On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals The American Statistician. ,vol. 55, pp. 182- 186 ,(2001) , 10.1198/000313001317097960