Multileaf collimator shape matrix decomposition

作者:

DOI: 10.1201/9780849305696

关键词:

摘要: An important method in cancer treatment is the use of high energetic radiation. In order to kill tumor cells patient exposed radiation that delivered by a linear accelerator whose beam head can be rotated about couch. Inevitably healthy tissue surrounding also some So problem arises arrange way such receives sufficiently uniform dose while damage normal as small possible. The standard approach this follows. First body discretized into so called voxels. set voxels then partitioned three sets: clinical target volume, critical structures and remaining tissue. There are certain constraints for each these parts. Basically volume has sufficient cancerous must not destroy functionality corresponding organs. determination combination fields usually done inverse methods based on physical models how passes through body. early 1990’s intensity modulated therapy (IMRT) was developed obtain additional flexibility. Using multileaf collimator (MLC) it possible form homogeneous different shapes. By superimposing an field delivered. MLC consists two banks metal leaves which block shifted irregularly shaped beams (Fig. 1). most common planning divide optimization phases. At first, angles fluence matrices determined. second step sequence leaf positions determined yields desired distribution. Very recently there have been attempts combine both steps one routine [22, 9].

参考文章(21)
Horst W. Hamacher, Frank Lenzen, A mixed integer programming approach to the multileaf collimator problem Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 210- 212 ,(2000) , 10.1007/978-3-642-59758-9_78
Nikhil Bansal, Don Coppersmith, Baruch Schieber, Minimizing Setup and Beam-On Times in Radiation Therapy Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques. pp. 27- 38 ,(2006) , 10.1007/11830924_5
James M Galvin, Xuan-Gen Chen, Robert M Smith, Combining multileaf fields to modulate fluence distributions. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 27, pp. 697- 705 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90399-G
H. Edwin Romeijn, Ravindra K. Ahuja, James F. Dempsey, Arvind Kumar, A Column Generation Approach to Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Using Aperture Modulation Siam Journal on Optimization. ,vol. 15, pp. 838- 862 ,(2005) , 10.1137/040606612
Srijit Kamath, Sartaj Sahni, Sanjay Ranka, Jonathan Li, Jatinder Palta, A comparison of step-and-shoot leaf sequencing algorithms that eliminate tongue-and-groove effects. Physics in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 49, pp. 3137- 3143 ,(2004) , 10.1088/0031-9155/49/14/008
Natashia Boland, Horst W. Hamacher, Frank Lenzen, Minimizing beam‐on time in cancer radiation treatment using multileaf collimators Networks. ,vol. 43, pp. 226- 240 ,(2004) , 10.1002/NET.20007
Thomas R. Bortfeld, Darren L. Kahler, Timothy J. Waldron, Arthur L. Boyer, X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 28, pp. 723- 730 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90200-3