Potential role of intensity modulated proton beams in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

作者: Laura Cella , Antony Lomax , Raymond Miralbell

DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01368-7

关键词:

摘要: Purpose: The present study was undertaken to assess the potential benefit of intensity modulated (IM) proton beams in optimizing dose distribution safely escalate tumor prostate cancer radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Four treatment plans were compared a patient aiming deliver 81 Gy target: 1) conformal 18 MV X-rays, 6-fields; 2) 214 MeV protons, 2-fields; 3) IM 15 5-fields; 4) 177–200 Mev 5-fields as Plan 3. In addition, methods used further 99 Gy. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) physically compare plans. DVH data also obtain normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for rectum, bladder, femoral heads, control probabilities. Results: Although planning target volume satisfactory with four plans, homogeneity slightly reduced both X-ray (IM standard) low-to-medium doses delivered all organs at risk, other tissues significantly by For prescribed Gy, only succeeded predicting an acceptably low NTCP rectum (<5%, Grade 3). integral nontarget (i.e., 3.1, 1.3, 1.7 times less than Plans 1, 2, 3, respectively). When escalating no additional improvement between protons observed. Conclusions: Both able optimize comply goal delivering highest while reducing risk severe morbidity acceptable levels. main advantage X-rays that achieved small (PTV) heterogeneity.

参考文章(28)
G.J. Kutcher, C. Burman, L. Brewster, M. Goitein, R. Mohan, Histogram reduction method for calculating complication probabilities for three-dimensional treatment planning evaluations. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 21, pp. 137- 146 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90173-2
David P Dearnaley, Vincent S Khoo, Andrew R Norman, Lesley Meyer, Alan Nahum, Diana Tait, John Yarnold, Alan Horwich, Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial The Lancet. ,vol. 353, pp. 267- 272 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05180-0
Howard M. Sandler, Daniel L. McShan, Allen S. Lichter, Potential improvement in the results of irradiation for prostate carcinoma using improved dose distribution International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 22, pp. 361- 367 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90055-M
T. Bortfeld, J. Bürkelbach, W. Schlegel, Three-Dimensional Solution of the Inverse Problem in Conformation Radiotherapy Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 503- 508 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-3-642-48681-4_82
B. Carey, K. Faulkner, A. Crellin, Quantitative Imaging in Oncology ,(1996)
A.L. Zietman, J.J. Coen, W.U. Shipley, C.G. Willett, J.T. Efird, Radical radiation therapy in the management of prostatic adenocarcinoma: the initial prostate specific antigen value as a predictor of treatment outcome The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 151, pp. 640- 645 ,(1994) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35036-X
Damien C Weber, Philippe Nouet, Michel Rouzaud, Raymond Miralbell, Patient positioning in prostate radiotherapy: is prone better than supine? International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 47, pp. 365- 371 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00458-7
Penny R Anderson, Alexandra L Hanlon, Arthur Patchefsky, Tahseen Al-Saleem, Gerald E Hanks, Perineural invasion and Gleason 7-10 tumors predict increased failure in prostate cancer patients with pretreatment PSA <10 ng/ml treated with conformal external beam radiation therapy International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 41, pp. 1087- 1092 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00167-9
William U. Shipley, Lynn J. Verhey, John E. Munzenrider, Herman D. Suit, Marcia M. Urie, Patricia L. McManus, Robert H. Young, Jenot W. Shipley, Anthony L. Zietman, Peter J. Biggs, Niall M. Heney, Michael Goitein, Advanced prostate cancer: The results of a randomized comparative trial of high dose irradiation boosting with conformal protons compared with conventional dose irradiation using photons alone International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 32, pp. 3- 12 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00063-5