An Evaluation of Nasal Response following Different Treatment Regimes of Oxymetazoline with Reference to Rebound Congestion

作者: Sara Morris , Ronald Eccles , S. Jawad Martez , Donald K. Riker , Theodore J. Witek

DOI: 10.2500/105065897782537197

关键词:

摘要: This was a randomized, double-blind vehicle controlled study aimed at investigating the effects on nasal function of 7 days treatment with topical decongestant oxymetazoline (0.05% w/v). Fifty healthy volunteers took part in and these were randomly allocated to three groups (i) daily (b.i.d. 150 microliters per nostril) (ii) intermittent oxymetazoline, being substituted for morning doses 1, 3, 7; (iii) nostril). The airway assessed by measurement resistance (NAR) using posterior rhinomanometry, subjective scaling patency means visual analogue scale (VAS), clinical examination. On 2, 7, NAR VAS measurements obtained before dose up 6 hours after dosing; examinations also performed dosing days. made following withdrawal Days 8 9. Nonparametric analysis results showed that therapeutic tolerance did not develop over 7-day period, examination mucosa failed find significant evidence rhinitis. Evidence rebound congestion found 3 treatment, baseline within significantly greater Day compared 1 (p < 0.05). However, there trend toward increasing group course study, suggesting may have contributed congestion. Following treatments, only had higher 9 Subjective generally followed trends NAR.

参考文章(11)
Joseph Gollom, The Problem of Nasal Medication with Particular Reference to Privine HCl 0.1 Canadian Medical Association Journal. ,vol. 51, pp. 123- 126 ,(1944)
John T. Connell, M.Inez Linzmayer, 41 Studies of rebound phenomena and oxymetazoline The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. ,vol. 81, pp. 179- ,(1988) , 10.1016/0091-6749(88)90278-3
P. Graf, J.-E. Juto, Decongestion effect and rebound swelling of the nasal mucosa during 4-week use of oxymetazoline. Operations Research Letters. ,vol. 56, pp. 157- 160 ,(1994) , 10.1159/000276633
P. F. HARDCASTLE, A. WHITE, R. J. PRESCOTT, Clinical or rhinometric assessment of the nasal airway—which is better? Clinical Otolaryngology. ,vol. 13, pp. 381- 385 ,(1988) , 10.1111/J.1365-2273.1988.TB00770.X
W SILVERS, B LUTSKY, J MOONEY, H SHAPIRO, D LAZOTTE, M WIENER, 45 Defining rhinitis medicamentosa, rebound, and tolerance using anterior rhinoscopy and rhinomanometry The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. ,vol. 87, pp. 150- ,(1991) , 10.1016/0091-6749(91)91328-Q
A. H. BATTS, C. MARRIOTT, G. P. MARTIN, S. W. BOND, The effect of some preservatives used in nasal preparations on mucociliary clearance. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. ,vol. 41, pp. 156- 159 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.2042-7158.1989.TB06420.X
P. Cole, R. Forsyth, J. S. J. Haight, Effects of Cold Air and Exercise on Nasal Patency Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. ,vol. 92, pp. 196- 198 ,(1983) , 10.1177/000348948309200220
B Petruson, Treatment with xylometazoline (Otrivin) nosedrops over a six-week period. Rhinology. ,vol. 19, pp. 167- 172 ,(1981)
R Scheffler, T Deitmer, The effect of different preparations of nasal decongestants on ciliary beat frequency in vitro. Rhinology. ,vol. 31, pp. 151- 153 ,(1993)
van de Donk Hj, Merkus Fw, Muller-Plantema Ip, Zuidema J, The effects of preservatives on the ciliary beat frequency of chicken embryo tracheas. Rhinology. ,vol. 18, pp. 119- ,(1980)