On Inquiry: Human Concept Formation and Construction of Meaning through Library and Information Science Intermediation

作者: Allan Mark Konrad

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Library and Information Science (LIS) is centrally concerned with providing instruments (documents, organization, bibliographies, indexes) to enable people become better informed through use of documents. The relationship between how LIS intermediation, the Basic Relationship, fundamental theory, practice, professional education LIS. This Relationship it understood in field investigated analysis selected texts according criteria derived from principles Assimilation Theory, grounded educational psychology, integrated complementary ideas cognate fields ancient rhetoric, cognitive linguistics, philosophy, communications studies. These were applied 413 texts. Distinct interdisciplinary trend our field, utilize other as concepts, here, are used reveal core concepts that innate uniquely central primary finding express dissonance Theory a small extent (5.6%), consonance silence most (88.8%). Overall, found be not consonant Theory. leads recommendations (Part IV) for path an Theory-consonant comprised of: (1) conceptual indexing complement present information service, (2) constructive retrieval (CR) alternative (IR), (3) curriculum research program upon concern virtually all facets information: humans becoming (constructing meaning) via intermediation inquirers instrumented records, (4) differentiate others. A set skills (5) common researchers, service providers, students, educators described. can have favorable impact two ways: benefit paradigm takes into account their prior knowledge (as urged by Ausubel), important explanations never apparently known any specific person might discovered detection explanatory concept paths among disjunct literatures shown worked example Swanson's discovery undiscovered public associated dietary fish oil Raynaud's disease.

参考文章(270)
Deborah J. Mayhew, The Usability Engineering Lifecycle ,(1999)
Rebecca Green, Topical relevance relationships. I. Why topic matching fails Journal of the American Society for Information Science. ,vol. 46, pp. 646- 653 ,(1995) , 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199510)46:9<646::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-1
Jerry D. Campbell, Shaking the conceptual foundations of reference: A perspective Reference Services Review. ,vol. 20, pp. 29- 36 ,(1992) , 10.1108/EB049164
Douglas Tudhope, Dorothee Blocks, Daniel Cunliffe, A reference model for user-system interaction in thesaurus-based searching Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. ,vol. 57, pp. 1655- 1665 ,(2006) , 10.1002/ASI.V57:12
Mark Dunlop, Reflections on Mira: Interactive evaluation in information retrieval Journal of the American Society for Information Science. ,vol. 51, pp. 1269- 1274 ,(2000) , 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1042>3.0.CO;2-7
George A. Miller, Psychology and information American Documentation. ,vol. 19, pp. 286- 289 ,(1968) , 10.1002/ASI.5090190315