Practice management performance indicators in academic radiology departments.
作者： Silvia Ondategui-Parra , Jui G. Bhagwat , Kelly H. Zou , Adheet Gogate , Lisa A. Intriere
DOI: 10.1148/RADIOL.2333031147
关键词:
摘要: PURPOSE: To determine the management performance indicators most frequently utilized in academic radiology departments United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This investigation met criteria for an exemption from institutional review board approval. A cross-sectional study which a validated national survey was sent to members of Society Chairmen Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD) conducted. The designed examine following six categories 28 indicators: (a) general organization, (b) volume and productivity, (c) reporting, (d) access examinations, (e) customer satisfaction, (f) finance. total 158 variables were included analysis. Summary statistics, χ2 test, rank correlation, multiple regression analysis, analysis variance used. RESULTS: response rate 42% (55 132 SCARD members) achieved. mean number used by 16 ± 6.35 (standard deviation...
rsna.org
rsnajnls.org参考文章(22)
Jason Oliveira, The balanced scorecard: an integrative approach to performance evaluation. Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association. ,vol. 55, pp. 42- 46 ,(2001)
Breedlove Th, Measuring the impact of quality improvement efforts. Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association. ,vol. 48, pp. 32- ,(1994)
Stewart Lj, Lockamy A rd, Improving competitiveness through performance-measurement systems. Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association. ,vol. 55, pp. 46- 50 ,(2001)
Marya L. Doerfel, Brent D. Ruben, Developing More Adaptive, Innovative, and Interactive Organizations. New Directions for Higher Education. ,vol. 2002, pp. 5- 28 ,(2002) , 10.1002/HE.53
C H Deitch, W C Chan, J H Sunshine, M D Zinninger, P N Cascade, S T Cochran, Quality assessment and improvement: what radiologists do and think. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 163, pp. 1245- 1254 ,(1994) , 10.2214/AJR.163.5.7976910
Steven E. Seltzer, Pauline Kelly, Gina Mammone Deibel, Pablo Ros, Radiology quality and performance metrics on the Web: a management information and communications tool. Academic Radiology. ,vol. 7, pp. 981- 985 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80182-8
Khim Ling Sim, Hian Chye Koh, Balanced scorecard: a rising trend in strategic performance measurement Measuring Business Excellence. ,vol. 5, pp. 18- 27 ,(2001) , 10.1108/13683040110397248
P J Slanetz, R H Moore, C A Hulka, E F Halpern, D Habunek, G J Whitman, K A McCarthy, D A Hall, D B Kopans, Physicians' opinions on the delivery of mammographic screening services : Immediate interpretation versus double reading American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 167, pp. 377- 379 ,(1996) , 10.2214/AJR.167.2.8686608
R L Birdwell, D M Ikeda, R J Brenner, Methods of compliance with Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations for tracking positive mammograms: survey results. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 172, pp. 691- 696 ,(1999) , 10.2214/AJR.172.3.10063862
Gerald K DeBusk, Robert M Brown, Larry N Killough, Components and relative weights in utilization of dashboard measurement systems like the Balanced Scorecard The British Accounting Review. ,vol. 35, pp. 215- 231 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0890-8389(03)00026-X