Innovation Streams and Ambidextrous Organizational Designs: On Building Dynamic Capabilities

作者: Michael Tushman , George Westerman , Robert Wood , Charles O'Reilly , Wendy Smith

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: This paper explores the roots of dynamic organizational capabilities. We suggest that streams innovation are central to a firm’s argue design is an important determinant and these can be effectively executed within organizations through ambidextrous designs. Based on in-depth data 15 business units 36 episodes we explore consequences organization choices outcomes. phenomena designs what they are, how operate, their association with also boundary conditions as well complex forms evolve. Functional designs, cross-functional teams, unsupported teams significantly less effective in hosting than Ambidextrous for all types non-incremental innovations except product substitution events. Further, use was associated sustained performance existing products. While not were successful, firms did employ unable implement innovations. Two initiated spinouts but only after design. These exploratory results senior leadership behaviors powerful levers driving permit unit simultaneously exploit. discuss implications ongoing debate nature capabilities evolution.

参考文章(63)
Michael E. Porter, What is strategy Harvard Business College. ,vol. 6, pp. 61- 78 ,(2000)
G Westerman, Johann P Murmann, None, Dominant Designs, Technological Cycles and Organizational Outcomes Blackwell Publishers. ,(2002)
Carliss Y. Baldwin, Kim B. Clark, Design Rules The MIT Press. ,(2000) , 10.7551/MITPRESS/2366.001.0001
Michael L Tushman, Elaine Romanelli, Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation Research in Organizational Behavior. ,(1985)
Jan W. Rivkin, Nicolaj Siggelkow, Choice Interaction and Organizational Structure Social Science Research Network. ,(2001) , 10.2139/SSRN.282641