Shifting and Deepening Engagements Experimental Normativity in Public Participation in Science

作者: Michiel van Oudheusden

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Public participation in science, technology, and innovation is a significant trend contemporary western democracies, which increasingly implicates the social scientist diverse ways. Yet, question as to how scientists actually engage public participation, their engagements may be normatively justified, not object of systematic consideration participatory frameworks action-oriented science. In this article, we ask can take responsibility for normative choices when engaging practice. Drawing on our experiences researchers nanotechnologies Flanders (Belgium) France, respectively, reflectively consider relationship with research subjects, political relevance work, problems deal with. This leads us articulate three modes normativity that inform commitments: process mode, critical mode inspired by Actor Network Theory. Differentiating between these garnering sensitivity towards each mode’s characteristics opens way experimentation different types through accounts his commitments shifts or deepens response conflicting demands real-world circumstances. Thus, rather than endorsing one approach recommend pragmatic attitude implies probing roles assumes vis-a-vis other participants, interests, objectives, enables him continually adjust position view particularities situation.

参考文章(42)
Lieve Goorden, Michiel van Oudheusden, Johan Evers, Marian Deblonde, Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow’s Society: A Case for Reflective Action Research in Flanders, Belgium The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Volume I: Presenting Futures. pp. 163- 182 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-1-4020-8416-4_14
Lena Wilhelmson, On the Theory of Transformative Learning Münster: LIT Verlag. pp. 180- 210 ,(2002)
Arie Rip, Modernity and technology - an afterword Modernity and technology. pp. 359- 372 ,(2003)
Edward Woodhouse, David Hess, Steve Breyman, Brian Martin, Science Studies and Activism Possibilities and Problems for Reconstructivist Agendas Social Studies of Science. ,vol. 32, pp. 297- 319 ,(2002) , 10.1177/0306312702032002004
Arie Rip, Controversies as informal technology assessment Science Communication. ,vol. 8, pp. 349- 371 ,(1986) , 10.1177/107554708600800216
Patrick W. Hamlett, Technology Theory and Deliberative Democracy Science, Technology, & Human Values. ,vol. 28, pp. 112- 140 ,(2003) , 10.1177/0162243902238498
Teun Zuiderent-Jerak, Casper Bruun Jensen, Editorial Introduction: Unpacking ‘Intervention’ in Science and Technology Studies Science As Culture. ,vol. 16, pp. 227- 235 ,(2007) , 10.1080/09505430701568552
Bruno Latour, The pasteurization of France ,(1988)