Reflections and Conclusions

作者: David D. Dill , Maarja Beerkens

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3754-1_16

关键词:

摘要: The massification of higher education, the rapid development new academic subjects and fields, growing international market competition among universities, associated deregulation government policy institutional autonomy, commercial provision quality information, resulting arms race for research reputation prestige have challenged traditional ways maintaining standards. In this concluding chapter we reflect on lessons to be learned from our studies professional regulation, state regulation explore how necessary balance different forces can best accomplished. We also attempt derive these individual instruments some general guidelines that may prove useful in designing national framework conditions assuring standards university sector.

参考文章(26)
J.-J. Laffont, J. Tirole, The Politics of Government Decision-Making: A Theory of Regulatory Capture Quarterly Journal of Economics. ,vol. 106, pp. 1089- 1127 ,(1991) , 10.2307/2937958
Alberto M.S.C. Amaral, The US accreditation system and the CRE’s quality audits ‐ a comparative study Quality Assurance in Education. ,vol. 6, pp. 184- 196 ,(1998) , 10.1108/09684889810242173
Clifford Adelman, The Bologna Process for U.S. Eyes: Re-learning Higher Education in the Age of Convergence Institute for Higher Education Policy. ,(2009)
José-Ginés Mora, A Decade of Quality Assurance in Spanish Universities Higher Education Dynamics. pp. 421- 443 ,(2004) , 10.1007/978-1-4020-2797-0_19