How Party Polarization Affects Governance
作者： Frances E. Lee
DOI: 10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-072012-113747
关键词:
摘要: The purpose of this review is to take stock of how party polarization affects governance in the United States. The article begins by defining polarization and discussing the means by which it can be measured. It is undeniable that the two parties have grown more sharply differentiated. Some evidence suggests that the substantive policy preferences of liberals and conservatives diverge more widely, but the case for ideological polarization in the spatial sense is not definitive. Effects on the institutional processes of US government have …
sci-hub.se 参考文章(101)
Sharyn O'Halloran, David Epstein, Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers ,(1999)
Philip E. Converse, The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics Psychology Press. pp. 181- 199 ,(2004) , 10.4324/9780203505984-10
James A. Stimson, Christopher Ellis, Ideology in America ,(2012)
Justin Grimmer, Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters ,(2013)
David Karol, Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management ,(2009)
William G. Howell, Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action ,(2003)
Steven S. Smith, Party Influence in Congress ,(2007)
Frances E. Lee, Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U. S. Senate ,(2009)
George C. Edwards, On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit ,(2003)
Steven S. Smith, The Senate Syndrome: The Evolution of Procedural Warfare in the Modern U.S. Senate ,(2014)