The impact of technological change on climate protection and welfare: Insights from the model MIND

作者: Ottmar Edenhofer , Nico Bauer , Elmar Kriegler

DOI: 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2004.12.030

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Avoiding dangerous climate change is likely to require policies mitigate CO2 emissions that are substantially more ambitious than those currently being considered. For such policies, the issue of endogenous technological becomes important, both estimate overall costs and identify intertemporally cost-effective combination mitigation options. In this paper, we first discuss recent literature evaluates potential for reduce costs, efforts incorporate into pre-existing integrated assessment models. Then formulate our own model, Model INvestment Technological Development (MIND), which allows analysis relationship between specific options protection objectives. Our model reveals two important results. First, incorporation in a portfolio can substantially. Achieving policy goals necessary avoid feasible without significant welfare losses. Second, different importance achieving goals: improving energy efficiency too costly as major option long run. run, fossil fuels have be substituted by renewable sources because backstop technology with learning-by-doing has strongest impact on reducing losses due protection. Furthermore, Carbon Capturing Sequestration allow further reduction postpone need transform system from fossil-fuel-based one renewables one.

参考文章(29)
N BAUER, O EDENHOFER, H HELD, E KRIEGLER, Uncertainty of the role of carbon capture and sequestration within climate change mitigation strategies Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7#R##N#Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 5– September 2004, Vancouver, Canada. pp. 931- 939 ,(2005) , 10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50094-X
Arnulf Grübler, William D Nordhaus, None, Technological Change and the Environment Routledge. ,(2002) , 10.4324/9781936331758
O EDENHOFER, H HELD, N BAUER, A regulatory framework for carbon capturing and sequestration within the post-kyoto process Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7#R##N#Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 5– September 2004, Vancouver, Canada. pp. 989- 997 ,(2005) , 10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50100-2
Nicholas Kaldor, Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth Palgrave Macmillan, London. pp. 177- 222 ,(1961) , 10.1007/978-1-349-08452-4_10
N. Nakicenovic, K. Riahi, An Assessment of Technological Change Across Selected Energy Scenarios RR-02-005. Reprinted from Energy Technologies for the 21st Century, World Energy Council, London [September 2001]. ,(2001)
Jose Goldemberg, et-al, None, World energy assessment : energy and the challenge of sustainability United Nations Development Programme. ,(2000)
Charles Blackorby, R Robert Russell, Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? (A Comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities) The American Economic Review. ,vol. 79, pp. 882- 888 ,(1989)
Alan Manne, Robert Mendelsohn, Richard Richels, MERGE. A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies Energy Policy. ,vol. 23, pp. 17- 34 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0301-4215(95)90763-W
Richard N. Cooper, J. T. Houghton, James J. McCarthy, Bert Metz, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis Foreign Affairs. ,vol. 81, pp. 208- ,(2002) , 10.2307/20033020
U. Cubasch, GA Meehl, GJ Boer, RJ Stouffer, M Dix, A Noda, CA Senior, S u Raper, KS Yap, None, Projections of Future Climate Change EPIC3, in: J.T Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. Van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C.A. Johnson (eds.): Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel, pp. 526-582. ,(2001)