Entangled futures and responsibilities in technology assessment

作者: Erik Fisher

DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1372061

关键词:

摘要: Drawing upon decades of thought, critique, and learning about the social shaping science technology, responsible innovation (RI) benefits from numerous scholarly policy precedents. Perha...

参考文章(12)
Sascha Dickel, Jan-Felix Schrape, The renaissance of techno-utopianism as a challenge for responsible innovation Journal of Responsible Innovation. ,vol. 4, pp. 289- 294 ,(2017) , 10.1080/23299460.2017.1310523
Helge Torgersen, Daniela Fuchs, Technology assessment as a myth buster: deconstructing myths around emerging technologies Journal of Responsible Innovation. ,vol. 4, pp. 118- 137 ,(2017) , 10.1080/23299460.2017.1320157
Harro van Lente, Tsjalling Swierstra, Pierre-Benoît Joly, Responsible innovation as a critique of technology assessment Journal of Responsible Innovation. ,vol. 4, pp. 254- 261 ,(2017) , 10.1080/23299460.2017.1326261
Pierre Delvenne, Responsible research and innovation as a travesty of technology assessment Journal of Responsible Innovation. ,vol. 4, pp. 278- 288 ,(2017) , 10.1080/23299460.2017.1328653
Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer, Martin Meister, Laboratory settings as built anticipations – prototype scenarios as negotiation arenas between the present and imagined futures Journal of Responsible Innovation. ,vol. 4, pp. 197- 216 ,(2017) , 10.1080/23299460.2017.1326260
Silke Zimmer-Merkle, Torsten Fleischer, Eclectic, random, intuitive? Technology assessment, RRI, and their use of history Journal of Responsible Innovation. ,vol. 4, pp. 217- 233 ,(2017) , 10.1080/23299460.2017.1338105
Andreas Lösch, Reinhard Heil, Christoph Schneider, Responsibilization through visions Journal of Responsible Innovation. ,vol. 4, pp. 138- 156 ,(2017) , 10.1080/23299460.2017.1360717