Magnetic Resonance Imaging Susceptibility Artifacts Due to Metallic Foreign Bodies

作者: SILKE HECHT , WILLIAM H. ADAMS , JILL NARAK , WILLIAM B. THOMAS

DOI: 10.1111/J.1740-8261.2011.01809.X

关键词:

摘要: Susceptibility artifacts due to metallic foreign bodies may interfere with interpretation of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies. Additionally, migration objects pose a risk patients undergoing MR imaging. Our purpose was investigate prevalence, underlying cause, and diagnostic implications susceptibility in small animal report associated adverse effects. studies performed dogs cats between April 2008 March 2010 were evaluated retrospectively for the presence bodies. Studies using 1.0 T scanner. Severity graded as 0 (no interference area interest), 1 (extension artifact interest without impairment quality), 2 (impairment quality but diagnosis still possible), or 3 (severe involvement resulting nondiagnostic study). Medical records identify present 99/754 (13.1%) most common examinations brachial plexus, thorax, cervical spine. Artifacts caused by identification microchips, ballistic fragments, skin staples/suture material, hemoclips, an ameroid constrictor, surgical hardware. Three artifact. Adverse effects not documented.

参考文章(10)
P A Swietek, R M Wright, M L Simmons, Eye artifacts from mascara in MRI. American Journal of Neuroradiology. ,vol. 6, pp. 652- 652 ,(1985)
Miyoko SAITO, Shin ONO, Hideki KAYANUMA, Muneki HONNAMI, Makoto MUTO, Yumi UNE, Evaluation of the susceptibility artifacts and tissue injury caused by implanted microchips in dogs on 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. ,vol. 72, pp. 575- 581 ,(2010) , 10.1292/JVMS.09-0386
Hideki MATSUURA, Takashi INOUE, Kuniaki OGASAWARA, Makoto SASAKI, Hiromu KONNO, Yasutaka KUZU, Hideaki NISHIMOTO, Akira OGAWA, Quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts caused by neurosurgical biomaterials: comparison of 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla magnetic fields. Neurologia Medico-chirurgica. ,vol. 45, pp. 395- 399 ,(2005) , 10.2176/NMC.45.395
I. M. Burtscher, T. Owman, B. Romner, F. Ståhlberg, S. Holtås, Aneurysm clip MR artifacts. Titanium versus stainless steel and influence of imaging parameters Acta Radiologica. ,vol. 39, pp. 70- 76 ,(1998) , 10.1080/02841859809172153
R W Laakman, B Kaufman, J S Han, A D Nelson, M Clampitt, A M O'Block, J R Haaga, R J Alfidi, MR imaging in patients with metallic implants. Radiology. ,vol. 157, pp. 711- 714 ,(1985) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.157.3.4059558
SEAN R. FREER, PETER V. SCRIVANI, Postoperative susceptibility artifact during magnetic resonance imaging of the vertebral column in two dogs and a cat. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. ,vol. 49, pp. 30- 34 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1740-8261.2007.00313.X
Jana Starčuková, Zenon Starčuk, Hana Hubálková, Igor Linetskiy, Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts. Dental Materials. ,vol. 24, pp. 715- 723 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2007.07.002
Mi-Jung Lee, Sungjun Kim, Sung-Ah Lee, Ho-Taek Song, Yong-Min Huh, Dae-Hong Kim, Seung Hwan Han, Jin-Suck Suh, Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. Radiographics. ,vol. 27, pp. 791- 803 ,(2007) , 10.1148/RG.273065087
Andrew T. Parry, Andrew Tanner, Kate Chandler, Christopher R. Lamb, What is your diagnosis? Foreign body. Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association. ,vol. 237, pp. 359- 360 ,(2010) , 10.2460/JAVMA.237.4.359