Areas of global importance for terrestrial biodiversity, carbon, and water

作者: Martin Jung , Andy Arnell , Xavier De Lamo , Shaenandhoa Garcia-Rangel , Matthew Lewis

DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.16.021444

关键词:

摘要: To meet the ambitious objectives of biodiversity and climate conventions, countries international community require clarity on how these can be operationalized spatially, multiple targets pursued concurrently. support governments political spatial guidance is needed to identify which areas should managed for conservation generate greatest synergies between nature9s contribution people (NCP). Here we present results from a joint optimization that maximizes improvements in species status, carbon retention water provisioning rank terrestrial priorities globally. We found that, selecting top-ranked 30% (respectively 50%) would conserve 62.4% (86.8%) estimated total stock 67.8% (90.7%) all clean provisioning, addition improving status 69.7% (83.8%) considered. If priority was given only, managing optimally located land area may sufficient improve 86.3% plant vertebrate Earth. Our provide global baseline where could conservation. discuss such prioritisation framework implementation conventions.

参考文章(105)
Carsten Meyer, Patrick Weigelt, Holger Kreft, Multidimensional biases, gaps and uncertainties in global plant occurrence information Ecology Letters. ,vol. 19, pp. 992- 1006 ,(2016) , 10.1111/ELE.12624
Lucie M. Bland, Ben Collen, C. David L. Orme, Jon Bielby, Predicting the conservation status of data-deficient species. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 29, pp. 250- 259 ,(2015) , 10.1111/COBI.12372
Aija S. Kukkala, Atte Moilanen, Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning. Biological Reviews of The Cambridge Philosophical Society. ,vol. 88, pp. 443- 464 ,(2013) , 10.1111/BRV.12008
Saara J. DeWalt, GeneviÈve Bourdy, Lia R. ChÁvez de Michel, Celin Quenevo, Ethnobotany of the Tacana : Quantitative inventories of two permanent plots of Northwestern Bolivia Economic Botany. ,vol. 53, pp. 237- 260 ,(1999) , 10.1007/BF02866635
DJ Curnick, CEI Head, D Huang, M James C Crabbe, M Gollock, BW Hoeksema, KG Johnson, R Jones, HJ Koldewey, DO Obura, BR Rosen, DJ Smith, ML Taylor, JR Turner, S Wren, DW Redding, None, Setting evolutionary‐based conservation priorities for a phylogenetically data‐poor taxonomic group (Scleractinia) Animal Conservation. ,vol. 18, pp. 303- 312 ,(2015) , 10.1111/ACV.12185
Carsten Meyer, Holger Kreft, Robert Guralnick, Walter Jetz, Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions. Nature Communications. ,vol. 6, pp. 8221- 8221 ,(2015) , 10.1038/NCOMMS9221
J. Carwardine, K. A. Wilson, G. Ceballos, P. R. Ehrlich, R. Naidoo, T. Iwamura, S. A. Hajkowicz, H. P. Possingham, Cost-effective priorities for global mammal conservation Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 105, pp. 11446- 11450 ,(2008) , 10.1073/PNAS.0707157105
Joona Lehtomäki, Atte Moilanen, Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation Environmental Modelling and Software. ,vol. 47, pp. 128- 137 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2013.05.001
Malin C. Rivers, Steven P. Bachman, Thomas R. Meagher, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Neil A. Brummitt, Subpopulations, locations and fragmentation: applying IUCN red list criteria to herbarium specimen data Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 19, pp. 2071- 2085 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S10531-010-9826-9