Simulation training improves medical students' learning experiences when performing real vaginal deliveries.

作者: Ashlesha K. Dayal , Nelli Fisher , Diane Magrane , Dena Goffman , Peter S. Bernstein

DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0B013E3181B3E4AB

关键词:

摘要: OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between simulation training for vaginal delivery maneuvers and subsequent participation in live deliveries during clinical rotation to assess medical students' performance confidence with without training. METHODS Medical students were randomized receive or not on a mannequin simulator at start of 6-week clerkship. Both groups received traditional didactic teaching. One researcher, blinded randomization, scored student competence overall simulator. Delivery was (1-5, 5 being highest) weeks 1 Students surveyed self-confidence ability perform 5, evaluated using obstetric patient logs. RESULTS Thirty-three randomized, 18 [simulation group (SIM)] 15 no [control (CON)]. Clerkship logs demonstrated that SIM participated more than CON (9.8 +/- 3.7 versus 6.2 2.8, P < 0.005). reported increased delivery, when compared end clerkship (3.81 0.83 3.00 1.0, respectively, 0.05). The score significantly higher SIM, week (3.94 0.94 2.07 1.22, 0.001) (4.88 0.33 4.31 0.63, simulated environment. CONCLUSIONS who participate actively environment course Student is beneficial learn skills minimal risk environment, demonstrate competency maneuvers, translate this into confidence.

参考文章(9)
JF Crofts, D Ellis, TJ Draycott, C Winter, LP Hunt, VA Akande, Change in knowledge of midwives and obstetricians following obstetric emergency training: a randomised controlled trial of local hospital, simulation centre and teamwork training. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 114, pp. 1534- 1541 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2007.01493.X
Roxane Gardner, Daniel B. Raemer, Simulation in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. ,vol. 35, pp. 97- 127 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.OGC.2007.12.008
Helgi Johannsson, Gubby Ayida, Chris Sadler, Faking it? Simulation in the training of obstetricians and gynaecologists. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 17, pp. 557- 561 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.GCO.0000188726.45998.97
David C. Jude, Gary G. Gilbert, Diane Magrane, Simulation training in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 195, pp. 1489- 1492 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2006.05.003
Christian R Macedonia, Robert B Gherman, Andrew J Satin, Simulation laboratories for training in obstetrics and gynecology Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 102, pp. 388- 392 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00483-6
Shad H. Deering, Jonathan G. Hodor, Michele Wylen, Sarah Poggi, Peter E. Nielsen, Andrew J. Satin, Additional training with an obstetric simulator improves medical student comfort with basic procedures. Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. ,vol. 1, pp. 32- 34 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01266021-200600110-00003
Richard K. Reznick, Helen MacRae, Teaching Surgical Skills — Changes in the Wind New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 355, pp. 2664- 2669 ,(2006) , 10.1056/NEJMRA054785
Erika H. Banks, Scott Chudnoff, Ira Karmin, Cuiling Wang, Setul Pardanani, Does a surgical simulator improve resident operative performance of laparoscopic tubal ligation American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 197, pp. 541- 542 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2007.07.028