Issues in Energy Vulnerability Assessment: Looking for a Sustainable Choice of Natural Resource for Power Generation

作者: Tatiana Farane Mein , André Luiz Veiga Gimenes , Miguel Edgar Morales Udaeta , Eduardo Mario Dias , Stefania Gomes Relva

DOI: 10.3390/WEF-06929

关键词:

摘要: The objective of thiswork is to analyze, through environmental vulnerability (EV), disturbances in the environment caused by anthropic activities for production energy resources, focusing on power generation sector. Methodologically, hydrocarbons (oil and gas) solar are considered a qualitative quantitative analysis impacts, including research inside Environmental Impact Studies procedures like EIA/RIMA (institutional Reports Brazil). This study focuses operation demobilization offshore drilling activity, installation Santos Basin pre-salt oil gas disposal activity Stages 1, 2 3. criteria addressed EIA/RIMAs used, thosethat correlate with EV electricity. Impacts long-term, permanent, partially reversible or irreversible filtered, totaling 53 impacts (31 effective/21 potential). We concluded that methodologies EIAs vary between stages. At times, variation so drastic same impact can have completely different rating from one stage another, despite referring area. condition makes it impossible define single vulnerabilityindex venture. For final analysis, we propose cleaner distributed photovoltaic systems as more adequate alternative Sao Paulo’s supply terms its EV.

参考文章(22)
B.L. Turner II, Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 20, pp. 570- 576 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2010.07.003
B. L. Turner, Roger E. Kasperson, Pamela A. Matson, James J. McCarthy, Robert W. Corell, Lindsey Christensen, Noelle Eckley, Jeanne X. Kasperson, Amy Luers, Marybeth L. Martello, Colin Polsky, Alexander Pulsipher, Andrew Schiller, A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 100, pp. 8074- 8079 ,(2003) , 10.1073/PNAS.1231335100
M. Patricia Bradley, Elizabeth R. Smith, Using science to assess environmental vulnerabilities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. ,vol. 94, pp. 1- 7 ,(2004) , 10.1023/B:EMAS.0000016875.89092.E7
Amy L. Luers, The surface of vulnerability: An analytical framework for examining environmental change Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 15, pp. 214- 223 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2005.04.003
Hallie Eakin, Amy Lynd Luers, Assessing the Vulnerability of Social-Environmental Systems Annual Review of Environment and Resources. ,vol. 31, pp. 365- 394 ,(2006) , 10.1146/ANNUREV.ENERGY.30.050504.144352
Hyun-Jun Kim, Yoon-Seok Lee, Byung-Moon Han, Young-Doo Yoon, None, New Scheme for Seamless Operation for Stand-Alone Power Systems Energies. ,vol. 9, pp. 457- ,(2016) , 10.3390/EN9060457
Han-Shen Chen, Wan-Yu Liu, Chi-Ming Hsieh, Integrating Ecosystem Services and Eco-Security to Assess Sustainable Development in Liuqiu Island Sustainability. ,vol. 9, pp. 1002- ,(2017) , 10.3390/SU9061002
Tian-tian Feng, Yi-sheng Yang, Yu-heng Yang, Dan-dan Wang, Application Status and Problem Investigation of Distributed Generation in China: The Case of Natural Gas, Solar and Wind Resources Sustainability. ,vol. 9, pp. 1022- ,(2017) , 10.3390/SU9061022