Immediate Implants Placed in Infected and Noninfected Sites after Atraumatic Tooth Extraction and Placement with Ultrasonic Bone Surgery

作者: Cornelio Blus , Serge Szmukler-Moncler , Paul Khoury , Germano Orrù

DOI: 10.1111/CID.12126

关键词:

摘要: Background Only a few reports deal with implants placed in infected postextraction sites. Purpose Survival rates of cohort immediate cases acute and chronically sites were compared noninfected ones while (1) tooth extraction osteotomy prepared piezosurgery device (2) ultrasonication was applied to abate the bacterial charge at sites. Materials Methods Eighty-six patients received 168 distributed into three groups: (85), (36), (47) sites. Atraumatic implant performed an ultrasonic surgery without flap elevation. All same medication surgical protocol; ultrasonicated during 30 seconds 72 W. Kaplan–Meyer survival calculated 1 year. Results The 1-year noninfected, chronically, groups 98.8, 100, 94.4%, respectively. The differences not statistically significant. No lost after loading. teeth roots could be extracted one piece. Drilling sockets uncomplicated, skidding. Conclusions Implant might similar when receive standard medical treatment are ultrasonicated. tooth/root placement can reliably piezoelectric surgery.

参考文章(31)
Emeka Nkenke, Frank Rudolf Kloss, Karl Andreas Schlegel, Peter Kessler, Joerg Wiltfang, Stefan Schultze-Mosgau, Bone conditioning to enhance implant osseointegration: an experimental study in pigs. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 18, pp. 505- 511 ,(2003)
Serge Szmukler-Moncler, David Garber, Henry Salama, Cornelio Blus, Maurice Salama, Sinus Bone Grafting Procedures Using Ultrasonic Bone Surgery: 5-Year Experience International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. ,vol. 28, pp. 221- 229 ,(2008)
Arthur B Novaes Jr, Guaracilei M Vidigal Jr, Arthur B Novaes, Marcio FM Grisi, Sergio Polloni, Adalberto Rosa, None, Immediate implants placed into infected sites: a histomorphometric study in dogs International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 13, pp. 422- 427 ,(1998)
David L. Cochran, Daniel Buser, Christian M. Ten Bruggenkate, Dieter Weingart, Thomas M. Taylor, Jean-Pierre Bernard, Françoise Peters, James P. Simpson, The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 144- 153 ,(2002) , 10.1034/J.1600-0501.2002.130204.X
Arthur B Novaes Jr, Arthur B Novaes, Immediate implants placed into infected sites: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 10, pp. 609- 613 ,(1995)
Tiziano Testori, Francesco Zuffetti, Matteo Capelli, Fabio Galli, Roberto L. Weinstein, Massimo Del Fabbro, Immediate versus Conventional Loading of Post-Extraction Implants in the Edentulous Jaws Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 926- 935 ,(2014) , 10.1111/CID.12055
Arthur B Novaes Jr, Andréa M Marcaccini, Sérgio LS Souza, Mário Taba Jr, Márcio FM Grisi, None, Immediate placement of implants into periodontally infected sites in dogs: a histomorphometric study of bone-implant contact. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 18, pp. 391- 398 ,(2003)
Serge Szmukler-Moncler, Cornelio Blus, Atraumatic tooth extraction and immediate implant placement with Piezosurgery: evaluation of 40 sites after at least 1 year of loading. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. ,vol. 30, pp. 355- 363 ,(2010)
Nardy Casap, Chassiel Zeltser, Alon Wexler, Eyal Tarazi, Rephael Zeltser, Immediate Placement of Dental Implants Into Debrided Infected Dentoalveolar Sockets Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. ,vol. 65, pp. 384- 392 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.JOMS.2006.02.031
Daniel Buser, Regina Mericske-stern, Jean Pierre Pierre Bernard, Alexandra Behneke, Niklaus Behneke, Hans Peter Hirt, Urs C. Belser, Niklaus P. Lang, Long‐term evaluation of non‐submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8‐year life table analysis of a prospective multi‐center study with 2359 implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 8, pp. 161- 172 ,(1997) , 10.1034/J.1600-0501.1997.080302.X