Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses

作者: M. Sato , P. Baumhoff , A. Kral

DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2968-15.2016

关键词:

摘要: Electroacoustic stimulation in subjects with residual hearing is becoming more widely used clinical practice. However, little known about the properties of electrically induced responses cochlea. In present study, normal-hearing guinea pig cochleae underwent cochlear implantation through a cochleostomy without significant loss hearing. Using recordings unit activity midbrain, we were able to investigate excitation patterns throughout tonotopic field determined by acoustic stimulation. With implant and midbrain multielectrode arrays left place, ears pharmacologically deafened electrical was repeated condition. The results demonstrate that, addition direct neuronal (electroneuronal) stimulation, cochlea hair cells occurs (“electrophonic responses”) at site corresponding dominant temporal frequency components stimulus, provided these are SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Stimulation implants aids clinically neurophysiological characteristics underlying electroacoustic mechanism its benefit remain unclear. study directly demonstrates that does not interfere normal mechanical physiological function For first time, it double-dissociates (electrophonic responses) from auditory nerve fibers (electroneural responses), separate excited locations same animals. We describe condition which two spatially overlap. Finally, implicates using makes electrophonic unlikely implanted subjects.

参考文章(41)
Edwin Charles Moxon, Neural and mechanical responses to electric stimulation of the cat's inner ear. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ,(1971)
Ersin Avci, Tim Nauwelaers, Thomas Lenarz, Volkmar Hamacher, Andrej Kral, Variations in microanatomy of the human cochlea Journal of Comparative Neurology. ,vol. 522, pp. 3245- 3261 ,(2014) , 10.1002/CNE.23594
Maike Vollmer, Rainer Hartmann, Jochen Tillein, Neuronal Responses in Cat Inferior Colliculus to Combined Acoustic and Electric Stimulation Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology. ,vol. 67, pp. 61- 69 ,(2010) , 10.1159/000262597
Julie Arenberg Bierer, John C. Middlebrooks, Auditory Cortical Images of Cochlear-Implant Stimuli: Dependence on Electrode Configuration Journal of Neurophysiology. ,vol. 87, pp. 478- 492 ,(2002) , 10.1152/JN.00212.2001
Slavomir Biedron, Andreas Prescher, Justus Ilgner, Martin Westhofen, The Internal Dimensions of the Cochlear Scalae With Special Reference to Cochlear Electrode Insertion Trauma Otology & Neurotology. ,vol. 31, pp. 731- 737 ,(2010) , 10.1097/MAO.0B013E3181D27B5E
C. van den Honert, P.H. Stypulkowski, Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings. Hearing Research. ,vol. 14, pp. 225- 243 ,(1984) , 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90052-2
Alfred L. Nuttall, Tianying Ren, Electromotile hearing: evidence from basilar membrane motion and otoacoustic emissions. Hearing Research. ,vol. 92, pp. 170- 177 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00216-2
Ken I McAnally, Mel Brown, Graeme M Clark, Estimating mechanical responses to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hearing Research. ,vol. 106, pp. 146- 153 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00012-9