Structural clusters of evolutionary trace residues are statistically significant and common in proteins.

作者: Srinivasan Madabushi , Hui Yao , Mike Marsh , David M Kristensen , Anne Philippi

DOI: 10.1006/JMBI.2001.5327

关键词:

摘要: Given the massive increase in number of new sequences and structures, a critical problem is how to integrate these raw data into meaningful biological information. One approach, Evolutionary Trace, or ET, uses phylogenetic information rank residues protein sequence by evolutionary importance then maps those ranked at top onto representative structure. If form structural clusters, they can identify functional surfaces such as involved molecular recognition. Now that examples have shown ET binding sites focus mutational studies on their relevant determinants, we ask whether method be improved so applicable large scale. To address this question, introduce treatment gaps resulting from insertions deletions, which streamlines selection used input. We also objective statistics assess significance total clusters size largest one. As result novel gaps, performance improves measurably. find evolutionarily privileged are significant 5% level 45 out 46 (98%) proteins drawn variety classes functions. In 37 38 for protein-ligand complex available, dominant cluster contacts ligand. conclude spatial clustering important general phenomenon, consistent with cooperative nature determine structure function. practice, results suggest applied scale fraction structures databank (PDB). This approach combining obtain detailed insights basis function should prove valuable context Structural Genomics Initiative.

参考文章(29)
R. Onrust, P. Herzmark, P. Chi, P. D. Garcia, O. Lichtarge, C. Kingsley, H. R. Bourne, Receptor and βγ Binding Sites in the α Subunit of the Retinal G Protein Transducin Science. ,vol. 275, pp. 381- 384 ,(1997) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.275.5298.381
Ruth Nussinov, Haim J. Wolfson, Zipora Y. Fligelman, Maxim Shatsky, Alignment of Flexible Protein Structures intelligent systems in molecular biology. ,vol. 8, pp. 329- 343 ,(2000)
Mathew E. Sowa, Wei He, Kevin C. Slep, Michele A. Kercher, Olivier Lichtarge, Theodore G. Wensel, Prediction and confirmation of a site critical for effector regulation of RGS domain activity. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. ,vol. 8, pp. 234- 237 ,(2001) , 10.1038/84974
O. Lichtarge, H. R. Bourne, F. E. Cohen, Evolutionarily conserved Galphabetagamma binding surfaces support a model of the G protein-receptor complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 93, pp. 7507- 7511 ,(1996) , 10.1073/PNAS.93.15.7507
Olivier Lichtarge, Keith R Yamamoto, Fred E Cohen, Identification of functional surfaces of the zinc binding domains of intracellular receptors. Journal of Molecular Biology. ,vol. 274, pp. 325- 337 ,(1997) , 10.1006/JMBI.1997.1395
Steven Henikoff, Jorja G. Henikoff, AUTOMATED ASSEMBLY OF PROTEIN BLOCKS FOR DATABASE SEARCHING Nucleic Acids Research. ,vol. 19, pp. 6565- 6572 ,(1991) , 10.1093/NAR/19.23.6565
Kenneth H. Pearce, Mark H. Ultsch, Robert F. Kelley, Abraham M. de Vos, James A. Wells, Structural and mutational analysis of affinity-inert contact residues at the growth hormone-receptor interface Biochemistry. ,vol. 35, pp. 10300- 10307 ,(1996) , 10.1021/BI960513B
Jaime Pascual, Maria Martinez-Yamout, H.Jane Dyson, Peter E. Wright, Structure of the PHD zinc finger from human Williams-Beuren syndrome transcription factor. Journal of Molecular Biology. ,vol. 304, pp. 723- 729 ,(2000) , 10.1006/JMBI.2000.4308
Georg Casari, Chris Sander, Alfonso Valencia, A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. ,vol. 2, pp. 171- 178 ,(1995) , 10.1038/NSB0295-171
Buyong Ma, Haim J Wolfson, Ruth Nussinov, Protein functional epitopes: hot spots, dynamics and combinatorial libraries. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. ,vol. 11, pp. 364- 369 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00216-5